• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 3:01am
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 3:01am
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Stocks index trading journal: sp500, dow, nasdaq, dax, ftse 15 replies

Trading YM(Mini Dow) and Forex 48 replies

trading station - NO FXCM and supports mini 2 replies

$300 Start up in a Mini a/c - What trading system could increase this to $1000/month 70 replies

Mini trading success 14 replies

  • Interactive Trading
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
  • 226
Attachments: Trading the e mini nasdaq
Exit Attachments
Tags: Trading the e mini nasdaq
Cancel

Trading the e mini nasdaq

  • Last Post
  •  
  • 1 2526Page 272829 48
  • 1 26Page 2728 48
  •  
  • Post #521
  • Quote
  • Feb 19, 2017 9:42am Feb 19, 2017 9:42am
  •  DavidApol
  • | Joined Nov 2014 | Status: Member | 55 Posts
Quoting Divergence
Disliked
first candle made low the next candle took out high that's 2 candles the third candle took out the second candles high that's 3 candles the next 2 candles made LL
Ignored
Thank you, Div! Have a good day.

Edit: Follow up query please. Based on trading method, we would've put a sell limit order around the encircled area as price pulls back to it. Perhaps I am not seeing something or maybe I have a wrong understanding of how the method is traded?

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: For Screenshot 5.jpg
Size: 159 KB


Thoughts?

Thank you very much!

David
 
 
  • Post #522
  • Quote
  • Feb 19, 2017 11:15am Feb 19, 2017 11:15am
  •  jtrade
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: Member | 1,374 Posts
David - you just missed the 123 long that formed just after the swing low, which would have voided the short Limit order.

The swing low was also what I would call a "Double Bottom Higher Low" (get your head around that !), ie. another sign to cancel the short order.
 
 
  • Post #523
  • Quote
  • Feb 19, 2017 11:57pm Feb 19, 2017 11:57pm
  •  DavidApol
  • | Joined Nov 2014 | Status: Member | 55 Posts
Quoting jtrade
Disliked
David - you just missed the 123 long that formed just after the swing low, which would have voided the short Limit order. The swing low was also what I would call a "Double Bottom Higher Low" (get your head around that !), ie. another sign to cancel the short order.
Ignored
Hi Jtrade!

Thanks for the feedback. It's more clear to me now.

I definitely need to spend more time reading charts in order to recognize valid 123s (both large/more recognizable and small/less recognizable).

Thanks again!
 
 
  • Post #524
  • Quote
  • Feb 20, 2017 12:21pm Feb 20, 2017 12:21pm
  •  Rgo
  • | Joined Jan 2017 | Status: Member | 60 Posts
So what trade if any would you have put on in the area? Would u have taken a pullback long after the long 123 took out the previous high?
 
 
  • Post #525
  • Quote
  • Feb 20, 2017 7:44pm Feb 20, 2017 7:44pm
  •  DavidApol
  • | Joined Nov 2014 | Status: Member | 55 Posts
Quoting Rgo
Disliked
So what trade if any would you have put on in the area? Would u have taken a pullback long after the long 123 took out the previous high?
Ignored
Hi Rgo,

In my humble opinion, I think Div would've put a buy limit near but below the high of point 1 of the new 123.

David
 
 
  • Post #526
  • Quote
  • Edited 1:24pm Feb 21, 2017 4:38am | Edited 1:24pm
  •  The Cableguy
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: NQ eta moi lybov... | 3,030 Posts
You have to be careful around such areas. The important factor here is that it did not make a LL, thus trend is 'up' on the next higher degree.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: For Screenshot 5.jpg
Size: 166 KB


The first small 123 and pullback short, is a good trade... but whenever we get near to a previous inflection point, it becomes more important to see if it gets broken for trend continuance, or the opposite, (this is a generalisation, of course).

On the next degree up again, the trend is still down, until the peak to the left is broken. So you see how important it is to match the timescale of the trade that you are planning on taking. If you look, we are actually just printing sideways action, after the fresh HH, which is why i say, that the small 123 and subsequent pullback, was good to go, but the LL followed by HH, always suggests caution. Wait for a trend to establish itself... (This is Harold's thread, so that is just my own opinion, of course!).

As an aside, in EW world, the channel to the left was clearly in 5w and that can not be a single set, together with the crossovers for wave B, (which means it was corrective), meant that a fresh high was the most likely course for wave C - in this instance it was 100% (equal to) wave A;

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: For Screenshot 5a.jpg
Size: 175 KB
GoFundMe -stage-4-glioma-brain-cancer-fighter (link in my profile)
 
 
  • Post #527
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 4:50am Feb 21, 2017 4:50am
  •  jtrade
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: Member | 1,374 Posts
Morning, CG - you've been watching The DaVinci Code again, haven't you !?
 
 
  • Post #528
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 5:30am Feb 21, 2017 5:30am
  •  The Cableguy
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: NQ eta moi lybov... | 3,030 Posts
Quoting jtrade
Disliked
Morning, CG - you've been watching The DaVinci Code again, haven't you !?
Ignored

Hey JT, haha! it seems that way, does it not?! you do not approve of such witchcraft?!

The numbers and letters are confusing to any non EW'er (non believers!), but in all honesty, there is some very simple basics at work;

Attached Image


5w to a fresh HH will not be a single set unless it is a 'C' wave (end of a corrective set), thus if you see the above, it will normally have a second set (as a minimum) to follow...

(OK OK, i will keep it to my own thread!)
GoFundMe -stage-4-glioma-brain-cancer-fighter (link in my profile)
 
 
  • Post #529
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 5:57am Feb 21, 2017 5:57am
  •  tdforex
  • | Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 288 Posts
Quoting The Cableguy
Disliked
(OK OK, i will keep it to my own thread!)
Ignored
Thank you.
 
 
  • Post #530
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 6:12am Feb 21, 2017 6:12am
  •  jtrade
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: Member | 1,374 Posts
Quoting The Cableguy
Disliked
(OK OK, i will keep it to my own thread!)
Ignored
I'm embarrassed to write, dear CG, that I didn't know you had one.... here it is everyone, LOTS of very interesting charts : http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=582121

This is not my thread, but I do feel Harold made a great leap forward in the evolution of his FTTT thread with the present, very simple entry setup we have here - and as we see, for those new to it, there are often many questions required for clarification of just this simple entry setup combo (to include the 2B).

At the same time, I always think we over-focus on entries alone, when we need to address filtering trades (when there is a clear setup, but it makes sense not to take the trade), when to hold and when to fold. I understand that for some, Elliott Wave analysis is the important key here, but it can be a major distraction for those who choose not to use it.

And then again, without a steady emotional state whilst trading, we are unlikely to execute anything consistently : H's videos are an inspiring example of how one experienced trader addresses all of the above without getting flustered.
 
 
  • Post #531
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 6:25am Feb 21, 2017 6:25am
  •  The Cableguy
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: NQ eta moi lybov... | 3,030 Posts
Quoting jtrade
Disliked
{quote} I'm embarrassed to write, dear CG, that I didn't know you had one.... here it is everyone, LOTS of very interesting charts : http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=582121 This is not my thread, but I do feel Harold made a great leap forward in the evolution of his FTTT thread with the present, very simple entry setup we have here - and as we see, for those new to it, there are often many questions required for clarification of just this simple entry setup combo (to include the 2B). At the same time, I always think we over-focus...
Ignored

Indeed JT, i have long suggested that 2 people will never trade the same system in the exactly the same manner, for the very reason you just pointed out. The reason i stopped posting so much on the old flag trading the trend thread was simply because i had gone down the route of using EW to determine the 'safer' entries... but i appreciate that it makes no sense to post such on other's threads.

The interesting thing is that all i am doing is trading the pullback to the subwave (i) of each fractal set. This is exactly the same as Harold's method, just that i am zoomed in closer.

So Mr TD (above) might be relieved to read that i will again cease any input, but in actual fact, in reality, there is very little difference in methods.

The more important aspect, is indeed, how trading is approached in a psychological manner, of which, i think everyone would agree, Harold demonstrates perfectly.

I wrote the other day, that for me, it has been a huge personal struggle. If you are the kind of person, who in life will get wound up when something doesn't work and end up smashing said item to pieces.... this reflects in trading about how you are affected after a losing trade (and indeed vica versa, after a winner) - Despair vs Euphoria).

The ability to trade in a calm manner and rationalise each trade, whether good or bad equally, is essential to consistently winning... (imo!)
I totally agree that trading the retest of a Supply/Demand zone, has to be the simplest form of trading. No labels, or indicators req'd. Harold has simplified it and shows it for what it is.

I can not pretend that it has not been an influence on my own trading recently (for the better).
GoFundMe -stage-4-glioma-brain-cancer-fighter (link in my profile)
 
 
  • Post #532
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 6:29am Feb 21, 2017 6:29am
  •  tdforex
  • | Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 288 Posts
Excellent post JT.

And to add few points: How to take next trade after loss and manage it per your management rules and not get distracted because of loss. Sometimes one can get distracted after few good wins also. H is a great example. Just take the next one.

But I really understand why entries are so important for many. They give you context and clear way to start the trade. At first it's best to just take every entry and after a while go to the business of skipping some (I have been skipping longs at the absolute top of the day and shorts at the absolute bottom of the day).

And yes, you can't never manage trade perfectly, that's why rules are needed (Again, first rigid and after solid winning period you can become creative). I have been experimenting with some runners if I can take long from very bottom, but I am not sure yet, if runners really give anything special in the bigger context for me. I know the basic idea behind runners and stacking, but somehow just grabbing countless trades comes pretty near vs. having runners and it's much simpler than manage thos runners.

Also, one thing is that one should concentrate on raising the lotsize if one want's to get more money. Not adding new products or adding time for trading. It is a bit terrfiying, but after 2 lots it is coming a bit easier. No, I am not in 10 lot (yet). It took pretty long to get to two and now I need to make plan to go to 5. It would be pretty nice.

I can't see, why H couldn't trade 10 lot's or bigger.

And to add few points: How to take next trade after loss and manage it per your management rules and not get distracted because of loss. Sometimes one can get distracted after few good wins also.
 
 
  • Post #533
  • Quote
  • Edited 11:05am Feb 21, 2017 7:04am | Edited 11:05am
  •  jtrade
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: Member | 1,374 Posts
Quoting The Cableguy
Disliked
If you are the kind of person, who in life will get wound up when something doesn't work and end up smashing said item to pieces.... .
Ignored
Well, CG. if it makes you feel any better, the ONLY trader I know who has made millions trading fast (mainly tick) charts and also swing charts (mainly 60 min) - and excluding Ed Seykota, who I met on two occasions, who anyway trades off Dailies - started out about the same time as me (around the turn of the century !). He rented a small office space, essentially a small room, desk & chair with big 21" CRT monitors of the day (like a big old TV set).

As he continued to lose his (fairly large) initial starting capital during the first 18 months or so, complaints were made by others in the same building about the "trader who keeps using foul language" ! One day, after a particularly painful losing trade on the S&P 500 futures (in those days, $250/point), he lost it completely and kicked one of the monitors off his desk, sending it crashing - and smashing - to the floor, accompanied by a stream of expletives..... after which he was expelled from the building !!! It proved to be his turning point...

He ended up becoming what I can only describe as a trading machine : I tried to learn his method over a period of about 3 years, but I could never read a chart like he does. I even flew out to the US to spend a few days with him, to no ultimate avail. I could get his entries almost exactly, but it was his filtering and holding that made all the difference (and I should add that I had a handful of big months : +$17k being the largest - but mostly between +&- $2k, which gets draining after a while).

Edit : as I reread my post, I remember what he said to me when I left his group :

"The trouble with you, jtrade, is that you have never truly learned basic Support & Resistance"

If I had to say what is the single most important thing I focus on these days, it is Support & Resistance ...

Edit2 : & as I reread what I wrote above in my first Edit, I can tell you that it really hurts to do so... goddarn'it, it's taken me over a decade to start to take the basics clearly & seriously ...
 
 
  • Post #534
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 7:07am Feb 21, 2017 7:07am
  •  jtrade
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: Member | 1,374 Posts
Quoting tdforex
Disliked
E I can't see, why H couldn't trade 10 lot's or bigger.
Ignored
Let me know when you get to 10, td .
 
 
  • Post #535
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 7:24am Feb 21, 2017 7:24am
  •  tdforex
  • | Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 288 Posts
Quoting The Cableguy
Disliked
{quote} The more important aspect, is indeed, how trading is approached in a psychological manner, of which, i think everyone would agree, Harold demonstrates perfectly. I wrote the other day, that for me, it has been a huge personal struggle. If you are the kind of person, who in life will get wound up when something doesn't work and end up smashing said item to pieces.... this reflects in trading about how you are affected after a losing trade (and indeed vica versa, after a winner) - Despair vs Euphoria). The ability to trade in a calm manner...
Ignored
I agree 100%.

This is also one of the reason that I think copying someone elses system at first as close as 1 to 1 as possible is a good starting point. Eventually everyone makes the system their own, while we all are different persons. I have some 14 and 20 range-bars there to help me (Harolds Range setups - halfway bars pullback, but won't post them here while they might confuse ppl) But for someone who is looking for constistency those are not needed, Just do as H does and continue from there. H's ability to scrap some and let some ride is the secret sauce and he can do it exceptionally well per his own method.
 
1
  • Post #536
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 7:29am Feb 21, 2017 7:29am
  •  tdforex
  • | Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 288 Posts
Quoting jtrade
Disliked
{quote} Let me know when you get to 10, td .
Ignored
Let's see if it works or not. Of course I have ladders to the previous level if I make lot's of losses. Then I am back to 1 lot, can happen too!

By the way, I am trading YM, not NQ. I have been following YM so long and it somehow feels much more logical than NQ, so I trade that. YM is also a bit slower, which I like. Have to say that I am a bit amazed, while I have been a action junkie before regards trading.

My setups are usually combinations of H's vol setup and range bar halfway pullbacks and when they happen on "nice area" ie. not too much congestion.

Great story JT! Is he the "brick" guy? Do you know, what eventually happened after that raging phase. What did he discover in himself or markets?
 
 
  • Post #537
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 8:09am Feb 21, 2017 8:09am
  •  tdforex
  • | Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 288 Posts
Some stats for JT

Not very impressive, but consistent winning. These stats are from one month. One have to remember that be+1 counts as a win.

All trades Long Trades Short Trades
Total # of Trades 118 81 37
Percent Profitable 72,03 % 70,37 % 75,68 %
# of Winning Trades 85 57 28
# of Losing Trades 33 24 9
Profit Factor 2,64 2,63 2,67

Max. conseq. Winners 10 8 5
Max. conseq. Losers 3 3 2
Largest Winning Trade 0,16 % 0,16 % 0,13 %
Largest Losing Trade -0,07 % -0,07 % -0,06 %

# of Trades per Day 4,92 3,38 1,85
Avg. Time in Market 9,5 min 11,3 min 5,7 min

Shorts seem to be much faster and also giving slightly better hitrate. But, there are fewer shorts than longs.
 
 
  • Post #538
  • Quote
  • Edited 10:32am Feb 21, 2017 8:32am | Edited 10:32am
  •  The Cableguy
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: NQ eta moi lybov... | 3,030 Posts
Quoting jtrade
Disliked
{quote} Well, CG. if it makes you feel any better, the ONLY trader I know who has made millions........
Ignored

So there is hope for me yet then JT?! haha!

You should see the pile of old PC's and monitors out in my back field, from where they lay after being hurled out of my 3rd floor windowhere. One day, the timeteam, will have a field day! )

I love this post! only because i can relate to it so clearly! I too started at the turn of the century. I started out buying Tech stocks from newspaper tips, right at the top of the dotcom bubble, lost a packet. Took a while to pay off the credit cards used for purchases. Came back a couple years later and bought oilers, racked up another tonne of losses... went away for another short period. Then started trading oil, thought i was clever, started shorting at around $100 on it's way to $147, (with no particular strategy), blew another account, then started buying it within a year at $60, on it's way to $37 (ish from memory), same result.

The relief to close the positions at several thousand $'s of losses, is difficult to explain, but that burning sensation, dissapating, at least allowing sleep to recommence, is quite some relief.

Bought a couple of smallcaps heavily on leverage during the crash, couldn't bring myself to short anything. Both co's went down the pan, taking everything i had ever worked for with it. I also started shorting the markets as it broke into the start of the current bullphase, recognised another heavy loss and then went Long into a little known flash crash, which took out another account with it!

You name a mistake to make and i've done it... several times over... Intelligence means little in the world of trading. Being calm & rational does, in my book... two things that i have short supply of!

As you say, yo-yo-ing can take it's toll, as can being discretional. The only way to beat all of the psychological problems, (imo) is to have a system that is mechanical - thus you take every entry that the chart prints.

For all those joining this thread and being relatively new to trading... i am jealous! Study everything that H does, over and over again and you will never have to experience these huge losses. The most you will suffer (in one go) is already predetermined, but get it right and within a very short time, you will be seeing your pot increase.

I'm with you JT on feeling like so much time has been wasted, when it feels like the S/R thing was here all along and is basically the key to trading. Join in with the big boys or lose! The big boys move markets and the proof is in the charts, notice a price reaction and ask why it happened? because a large buy (or sell) order was placed there and the likelyhood is that it did not completely fill (depending how big/how many contract orders were placed?), so wait for the revisit and join in... We can not know about these orders until the evidence is in the chart, so this is why trading the pullback is ultimately more sensible and most importantly, more successful.

I've observed two different types which i wrote about recently. The 'V' shape reaction, (low liquidity) and then the 'battlefield' type where a series of bars will go no-where. Fights between bulls and bears.

Everything is relevant to the timescale that you are viewing... A 'V' on one timescale will be a 'battlefield on a much smaller timescale and vica versa.

From last weeks YM;

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: dow16-03-16a.png
Size: 170 KB
GoFundMe -stage-4-glioma-brain-cancer-fighter (link in my profile)
 
 
  • Post #539
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 9:24am Feb 21, 2017 9:24am
  •  jtrade
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: Member | 1,374 Posts
Quoting tdforex
Disliked
Some stats for JT Not very impressive, but consistent winning.
Ignored
Wrong, td, VERY impressive : well done !

Keep it up and you'll be at a 10 lot sooner than me
 
 
  • Post #540
  • Quote
  • Feb 21, 2017 10:33am Feb 21, 2017 10:33am
  •  erasmus66
  • | Joined Nov 2012 | Status: Member | 3,121 Posts
slow day:

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Image1.png
Size: 44 KB
Become the casino
 
 
  • Interactive Trading
  • /
  • Trading the e mini nasdaq
  • Reply to Thread
    • 1 2526Page 272829 48
    • 1 26Page 2728 48
0 traders viewing now
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2023