Greedy brokers try to make money from any possible way. As a result, many brokers have unfair rollovers. Ideally, when the rollover for long and short positions should be the same with negative signs. Considering the fees, the negative rollover is a little bit higher than the positive side.
However, there are many brokers that charge 90% for the negative side while paying only 10% for the positive side.
If this ratio is 60% to 40% I would call it fair and reasonable. For example, if long position for a pair has -0.6 swap, the short position should have at least 0.4.
Can you name brokers which have reasonable rollovers, where the negative and positive sides are similar. Of course, I mean reliable well-established regulated brokers, as new brokers try to offer attractive specifications but in long-terms they may suffer from other issues.
However, there are many brokers that charge 90% for the negative side while paying only 10% for the positive side.
If this ratio is 60% to 40% I would call it fair and reasonable. For example, if long position for a pair has -0.6 swap, the short position should have at least 0.4.
Can you name brokers which have reasonable rollovers, where the negative and positive sides are similar. Of course, I mean reliable well-established regulated brokers, as new brokers try to offer attractive specifications but in long-terms they may suffer from other issues.
