DislikedPrevious post deleted. Looks like 1.0642 was the high at 66.6%. Edit: Looks like 1.0642 was a,v. b,v at 1.0607. c=v at 1.0652 - 55 Cheers, U2 {image}Ignored
Cheers U2
Wait, or you will be slaughtered!
Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE 8,898 replies
Harmonic trading-harmonic patterns 525 replies
Mehrdadovic Elliott and Harmonic Based Trading Journal 3 replies
The Basics of Elliott Wave Theory 128 replies
Harmonic Wave Journal 1,285 replies
DislikedPrevious post deleted. Looks like 1.0642 was the high at 66.6%. Edit: Looks like 1.0642 was a,v. b,v at 1.0607. c=v at 1.0652 - 55 Cheers, U2 {image}Ignored
DislikedHi HM, If our HEW Ratios are correct, that should be the Brown c=b,v top. [1 pip below the 85.4% retrace of Wave a,v] EU 1H Chart: Cheers, U2 {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Well I think it's perfect.... well then we now looking for our target , Wave v, arround 1.0417 - 1.0384 {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Indeed...my wave iv was wrong (changed him at the chart but not on the spreadsheet.....) => Your spreadsheet is the right-one! I have a little question: you set the 76,4% and 85,4% in yellow. I think that is your target. Why you have this target? My target is 61,8% - 66,7% => reason is that they are the most correspondent levels in the projections with Wave (V) at 61,8% - 66,7% and the Wave (c) at 100% to 109,2%Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi, The red counting is delevering a better Wave v (more in line with the bigger wave)..... Look at the image for both countings. {image}Ignored
DislikedEU 5M Chart: This may be correct? Wave (ii) looks ok at 78%, therefore not b,iii [Added Short 1.0630 at top of DZZ] Cheers, U2 Edit: Chart updated {image}Ignored
So actually I have confidence in the move...al my lights are green. Anyway that isn't saying that it's right ofcourse