Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Help Me Establish The GbpUsd After Dinner Club 40 replies

Attachments: The Club!
Exit Attachments

The Club!

Quoting infinitus
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...n-email-review Julian Assange was most probably right, when he told in an interview, that Hillary is protected by big business, banks, media etc. (deep state) and that it is unlikely for Trump to win. With the latest FBI turn: two possibilities: A) the Clinton email-review was merely an act of save face of the FBI (pretending to do an honest new investigation B) the FBI tried a "revolt", but had to buckle under pressure
Quoting Earleone
{quote} 'You forgot C C) They did not find any new information. So no change in conclusion.
or D) The FBI played a game of "revolting" and doing its job despite politics but in reality FBI was part of the system that wanted to rally support for Hillary (lets not forget that the biggest fear atm for the Democrats is that people will assume that Hillary will win and they will not get up and actually go to vote)
"Bulls make money, bears make money, pigs get slaughtered"
Quoting manosk
{quote} {quote} or D) The FBI played a game of "revolting" and doing its job despite politics but in reality FBI was part of the system that wanted to rally support for Hillary (lets not forget that the biggest fear atm for the Democrats is that people will assume that Hillary will win and they will not get up and actually go to vote)
. If they wanted to rally support for Clinton they would not have been opening the case again. This did more harm to here campaign so it is a strategy that no one would use to help Hillary.

I think FBI has been under more heavy pressure then we know the last week.

The job to look the 650.000 emails is qte easy ( Trump for sure understood that and tried to make a false point in that it is not possible to look 650K mail during some days) and could and has been automated for mails known from before. Filter out all mails duplicate from known mails before and they maybe had left some 100 or 1000 emails that they had to look on. And if there was no new information in them, actually there was nothing else to do then to close it again. If there had been new information in new e-mails I do not think this case had been closed again.
Trading in the shadow of SM
Quoting chess king
E/A...4H chart. I will watching this chart next week.. {image}
OUT...
good one... Paid ++2xx pips
A bit of risk... to hold the trade here..

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Captura de ecra de 2016-11-08 22:29:20.png Size: 105 KB
Quoting manosk
{quote} {quote} or D) The FBI played a game of "revolting" and doing its job despite politics but in reality FBI was part of the system that wanted to rally support for Hillary (lets not forget that the biggest fear atm for the Democrats is that people will assume that Hillary will win and they will not get up and actually go to vote)

your D) is literally my A)
Quoting Earleone
{quote} . If they wanted to rally support for Clinton they would not have been opening the case again. This did more harm to here campaign so it is a strategy that no one would use to help Hillary. I think FBI has been under more heavy pressure then we know the last week. The job to look the 650.000 emails is qte easy ( Trump for sure understood that and tried to make a false point in that it is not possible to look 650K mail during some days) and could and has been automated for mails known from before. Filter out all mails duplicate from...

Wikileaks has other opinion. They say, that huge amount of mails would have to be manually checked, because Hillary often used different aliases
Quoting infinitus
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...n-email-review Julian Assange was most probably right, when he told in an interview, that Hillary is protected by big business, banks, media etc. (deep state) and that it is unlikely for Trump to win. With the latest FBI turn: two possibilities: A) the Clinton email-review was merely an act of save face of the FBI (pretending to do an honest new investigation B) the FBI tried a "revolt", but had to buckle under pressure
Quoting Earleone
{quote} 'You forgot C C) They did not find any new information. So no change in conclusion.
Quoting manosk
{quote} {quote} or D) The FBI played a game of "revolting" and doing its job despite politics but in reality FBI was part of the system that wanted to rally support for Hillary (lets not forget that the biggest fear atm for the Democrats is that people will assume that Hillary will win and they will not get up and actually go to vote)
Or Z:
A warning to HRC/ Do the job for which you are being elected nominated or face an impeachment.

PS/ Is there any website where it's possible to get some early previsions on the results? Thanks.
Don't be smart. Be rich.
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Wikileaks has other opinion. They say, that huge amount of mails would have to be manually checked, because Hillary often used different aliases
Then wikileaks are wrong. All IT persons that know databases can filter this qte easy. Reduce the amount of data needed to look on.
Trading in the shadow of SM
Quoting maximinus
{quote} {quote} {quote} Or Z: A warning to HRC/ Do the job for which you are being elected nominated or face an impeachment. PS/ Is there any website where it's possible to get some early previsions on the results? Thanks.
https://www.google.com/search?num=30...1/0///////////
Quoting Earleone
{quote} Then wikileaks are wrong. All IT persons that know databases can filter this qte easy. Reduce the amount of data needed to look on.

that would imply, that they really would have to know which aliases Hillary is using all the time.......
Quoting maximinus
{quote} {quote} {quote} Or Z: A warning to HRC/ Do the job for which you are being elected nominated or face an impeachment. PS/ Is there any website where it's possible to get some early previsions on the results? Thanks.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...e=presidential
Quoting infinitus
{quote} that would imply, that they really would have to know which aliases Hillary is using all the time.......
Actually not, You can link all known aliases in a filter to records of the body. Then you filter first the body of the e-mail against all known aliases and compare with other known body from earlier e-mailsl. . Actually qte easy to do. Not rocket science and computers do this very quick. 650.000 emails is not much for the e-mail part.
Trading in the shadow of SM
Quoting andexQ
{quote} https://www.google.com/search?num=30...1/0///////////
Quoting infinitus
{quote} https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...e=presidential
Thank you both of you. Finally decided to switch on my TV. What a surprise!Not.

Take care.
Don't be smart. Be rich.
Quoting maximinus
{quote} {quote} Thank you both of you. Finally decided to switch on my TV. What a surprise!Not. Take care.

It is so interesting to see the media, especially TV:

they are so one sided pro Hillary, it is hilarious. Reporting should be balanced. Now they have nearly tears in their eyes. Actually watching 3sat with coverage from Austrian media.
Quoting infinitus
{quote} your D) is literally my A)
you are right, but I added the twist that they were working together to create a bit of crisis and get the voters to rally behind Hillary.

Of course as you know now that didnt happen
"Bulls make money, bears make money, pigs get slaughtered"
Quoting infinitus
{quote} It is so interesting to see the media, especially TV: they are so one sided pro Hillary, it is hilarious. Reporting should be balanced. Now they have nearly tears in their eyes. Actually watching 3sat with coverage from Austrian media.
After the Brexit vote and US' elections, there is one lack of consensous about the importance of pools and the hidden vote. When nearly all the media, pools, social system alignes with one candidate or option, the pools never show the hidden or shamefull vote. Appear one citizen that feels shame about the option he wants, and will never answer he/ she will vote to the anti-system option because is so shamefull and disgusting... They feel shame in front of the question of the interviewer and they response that they haven't got their vote decide.

And this are the persons who incline the balance for the anti-system option. Hillary hasn't lost votes in the swing states or some states have been important like Pennsilvania or Michigan. But Trump's percentages, is the option has increase. Because the hidden vote. The media was so sided, some days ago, that was shamefull to say you were going to vote Trump.

Now, all the analists, will appear to explain what has happend. But all the explanation is on the hidden vote.
DOUBLE TOP ?? G/U 1H chart ... if break 235x zone ... 215x target?

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Captura de ecra de 2016-11-09 18:47:54.png Size: 113 KB
Quoting infinitus
{quote} It is so interesting to see the media, especially TV: they are so one sided pro Hillary, it is hilarious. Reporting should be balanced. Now they have nearly tears in their eyes. Actually watching 3sat with coverage from Austrian media.
Hilarious and pathetic. Let's see if he delivers on Syria and make an honest deal with VP to fook all the bearded bastards.
Don't be smart. Be rich.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...ust-got-buried

What an outstanding reading from Taleb.....
Quoting infinitus
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...ust-got-buried What an outstanding reading from Taleb.....
I do not se the price going back to 1,13xx area..

http://http://clubdecapitales.com/el...jetivo-1-0740/
GU - H4
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: `1.png Size: 17 KB
2 traders viewing now