Numerical analysis

if eurusd made a new low we should short it

i still believe that eurjpy will go lower so i will start to sell at a more close level as you can see in chart which will be 128.56

tranco i think eurusd will break this level so if it goes up and correct you should short but wait to short from a good entry point with small stop loss

Oran

There are the same calculation for bullish and bearish??

i am still at start i did not have an edge yet so better depend on stop loss you can long eurusd now with a tigh stop loss it is better to do that .

i tried to understand your question what do you mean

i am still long eurjpy and i think we should see 129.90 level i think that

i recalculate it after last move to down

please all demo


and use a tight stop loss

all have a nice day

gbpcad now

i will keep my long in eurjpy i think it had corrected enough to the down side our last target will be 132.50

our intermediate target is 131.56 our first target will be 129.69 we may have a correction from it

all have a nice day

did any one saw this move wooooooooow in eurjpy i was going to short but i did not

in one candle five minute 200 pips 100 down and then 100 up

we had the correction from 129.60 i wish i had went short i was thinking of it

i think this move was to clear out bulls of small traders and we should have a big up side move now lets watch

put your tight stop loss and demo

Hi orabi

the think we do here is to apply fibo with custom levels

yes that is right but it have rules as you can see you apply fibo with numbers you get from equations

a tweet was behind this move look at this news from Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...93M12Y20130423

the formula you use its fibo formula the 1st that find these formulas was Fibbonachi its self back in1200ac

no the formula i have posted here i am the first one to use them and they depend on a logic for first time also introduced by me as i know may be it is some where out there but i did not read it or copy and past it i realize it and understand it and i have reached it with common simple logic rules so i only took few rules and then made my own formula and numbers you can chick the Fibonacci formula your self and you will not find my formula in them

my equations are
f=(3-f)/2 and f =(f-3)/2

also

f=(3-f)*2 and f=(3-f)*2

also f=f-3 and f =3-f

also

f=f-2 and f= 2-f

also

f=f-1 and f= 1-f


this are all equations you can apply to this method

about Fibonacci rules they are not related you can see them in this post now


i created my equations in my own depending on simple logic that's all

no fibbonic rules says that f =f - 3 or f = (f-3)/2 or f=(f-3)*2 you can chick by your self

here is the link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number

if you chick thsi post which is from a man who knows a lot about Fibonacci he says that he have some problems

and that i am defining a new operation he means i am defining new rules

actually i did that but limited to certain variables we have with simple logic

this rules depend on simple logic only and it carries a lot of variables you should think about that

you can chick his post http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...34#post6627634

you think i could copy and past a thing then say it is from me i can not do that i am a doctor my friend if you want to see my certificates i will post it here


i made rules out of simple chain sequence and numbers and used them i never created numbers but i noticed this rules and relations so i used them

i also used a rule from Fibonacci to get to a fact that 0 + 0 = 1 and that is wrong for sure in normal logic

but because we have the Fibonacci chain which is 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 as you see

you add the number to next and you get the next

so i assumed to get zero we will add zero and eventually 1 comes after zero so we can say that 0 + 0 = 1


but that is all my own simple logic that's all

Fibonacci numbers where observed and studied they where not created you understand what i mean

you can create something but Fibonacci numbers are there

people noticed them out first as you said how studied them and made a logic for them is L.D.

so he made the logic and this is a big difference because when you make a logic for something that exist

you will limit your logic by what you have discovered only

that's why i replied to kbzea that you can always find a bigger rule that define your rules and add to it

all have a nice day

and if you understand the fibo tool very well

you will see that i am applying normal numbers levels they are not Fibonacci 2.5 is not a Fibonacci number or 7.5

it is a level that i reached with equations i made from simple logic you can see how gbpcad respect this levels

the fibo tool reflect the number you put in it so if you put a Fibonacci number it will reflect it

if you put a normal number like 4 or 9 or 2.5 or like this it will give you the level only of that number on chart

you get what i mean

i have put a possibility that some one could just steal my ides and create a system with them and then says it is

his own idea actually i dont care about that .i am from a good economic status family and i will not sufer from

poorness in my life i hope so no one knows the future but for sure i am very well

and also you can not add to a rule that you have taken you need to realize it so i will keep improving my way of

trading and methods and finding a new way i will not post them all for sure i will keep something for my self


so that's why i dont care really how this matter will end i have gave my idea and it is mine depending on simple

logic

that's all

all have a nice day