Interesting post from Francesc at FX Street regarding FXDD’s decision not to implement the NFA’s new hedging rule. Jim Green, Managing Director at FXDD, wrote in to say that FXDD “was not fighting NFA.” They’re just having “constructive conversations” with NFA about the new hedging rule:
http://blogs.fxstreet.com/francesc/2009/05/19/retail-forex-industry-fxdd-fighting-nfa-hedging-rule-a-misleading-information-apologies-fxdd/
Ok. FXDD may not believe they are fighting with NFA, but how else should NFA interpret FXDD’s decision not to implement the new hedging rule?
Of course, in fairness to FXDD, why should they implement a regulatory rule that will be harmful to their business if this same regulator continues to stall on their license application? This could be FXDD’s way of saying “give us a license, then we’ll implement your rules.”
But is it wise to take on NFA like this? This is why traders should sit on the sidelines until FXDD gets that license. They are playing a game of chicken with regulators. And in the current climate we are in where regulators are under enormous pressure to crack down on rogue financiers no trader wants to be in the middle of what could be one ugly head on collision.
http://blogs.fxstreet.com/francesc/2009/05/19/retail-forex-industry-fxdd-fighting-nfa-hedging-rule-a-misleading-information-apologies-fxdd/
QuoteDisliked“Dear Francesc: It has been some time since we last communicated. Although FXDD enjoys the coverage it (usually) receives on FXstreet, your recent headline was somewhat misleading and I want to state for the record that FXDD is not fighting the NFA on the hedging rule. As you know, FXDD is pending with the NFA and we discuss our application with the designated parties at the NFA. Our discussions with the NFA should not be interpreted as “fighting.” We have had and continue to have very constructive conversations...
Ok. FXDD may not believe they are fighting with NFA, but how else should NFA interpret FXDD’s decision not to implement the new hedging rule?
Of course, in fairness to FXDD, why should they implement a regulatory rule that will be harmful to their business if this same regulator continues to stall on their license application? This could be FXDD’s way of saying “give us a license, then we’ll implement your rules.”
But is it wise to take on NFA like this? This is why traders should sit on the sidelines until FXDD gets that license. They are playing a game of chicken with regulators. And in the current climate we are in where regulators are under enormous pressure to crack down on rogue financiers no trader wants to be in the middle of what could be one ugly head on collision.