I'm hoping someone can clear up a misunderstanding on my part in regards to using the Sharpe Ratio, or show me another way to compare risk-weighted results.
I was interested in using the Sharpe Ratio or something like it to help highlight areas in which my reward may have been enormous, but so was my risk, making it a less-than-ideal trade model. As I went looking about, I found that the Sharpe Ratio is only useful in comparing two securities/portfolio's/methods with the same risk profile, and it then posits which would reward you better.
Hopefully I got that bit right.
What I would like is some sort of equation that flattens or equalizes the reward, and then quantifies the risk of each security/portfolio/method relative to each other.
Or something that blends both, where we can see not only which one performed best, but which one took more risk.
I am hoping this is not some dumb newbie question, and any input would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
I was interested in using the Sharpe Ratio or something like it to help highlight areas in which my reward may have been enormous, but so was my risk, making it a less-than-ideal trade model. As I went looking about, I found that the Sharpe Ratio is only useful in comparing two securities/portfolio's/methods with the same risk profile, and it then posits which would reward you better.
Hopefully I got that bit right.
What I would like is some sort of equation that flattens or equalizes the reward, and then quantifies the risk of each security/portfolio/method relative to each other.
Or something that blends both, where we can see not only which one performed best, but which one took more risk.
I am hoping this is not some dumb newbie question, and any input would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance