I tested it for a while and checked the code. It left muitiple dots while it is changing direction in real time. This is a small bug, not repainting. I see no recalculation in the code, so according to the algorithm there is no repainting.
TOP 100 best indicators: post good indicators here 646 replies
Custom Indicators vs. Technical Indicators 6 replies
Lagging Indicators -vs- Leading Indicators 48 replies
Create MT5 indicators from MT4 indicators 3 replies
two version of FF tunnel Chart, one say down, one say up, which one is correct? 3 replies
DislikedI tested it for a while and checked the code. It left muitiple dots while it is changing direction in real time. This is a small bug, not repainting. I see no recalculation in the code, so according to the algorithm there is no repainting.Ignored
DislikedI just looked at the program and I cannot see any recursion of self referencing or shifts that attempt to look at a future bar. My conclusion is that it does not repaint. The random dots are caused by the index buffers not completely being cleared out with each new pass of the for loops.Ignored
DislikedI just looked at the program and I cannot see any recursion of self referencing or shifts that attempt to look at a future bar. My conclusion is that it does not repaint. The random dots are caused by the index buffers not completely being cleared out with each new pass of the for loops.Ignored
DislikedJust watching the current dot which has flashed from red to blue and back again a couple of times. Hmmmm... I suppose you would have to wait until it closes to take the trade. That dot was 14.48 uk time by the way.Ignored
DislikedYou should always wait for the close. Any indi will alternate if it is near the threshold of a signal. It's how the bar ends that matters.Ignored
DislikedThanks Pipjunky, I did know that honest, just being a bit thick. I tried 2 more trades after that, I waited for the close. Made 20 pts on the first and lost 15 on the next. That's a one minute Cable chart by the way.
The problem I have found, and this is with many indicators, you should wait for the close but by then you have missed a good chunk of the move or infact the move is over. Still longer timeframes are probably the best way to go.
Incidentally, has anyone compared this to a standard Stochastic. You still get the same signals only...Ignored
DislikedI tried 1 min as thought someone else was looking a 1 min earlier. I trade for a London bank and am not keen on going any lower than 1 hour, too much noise.
Interested to know what you filter it against? Support, resistence, moving averages, trendlines. It's probably also safer to take the trades crossing up from the 20 level and short from the 80.
Sh1t iv'e burnt my dinner!Ignored
DislikedWow, that's a lot of filters. Never heard of a "Logan". Must be on the forum somewhere no doubt. I like what your doing Pipjunky, I've always found this forum interesting.
Just ate my dinner, my wife left me boiled bacon and cabbage, I must be in her bad books. C u later.Ignored