I think I can explain the zones a little more clearly today as there is clearly a correlation between price turning in areas that it has turned before.
It occurred to me that these zones must signify an area where the price became very 'cheap' or 'expensive' respectively. When price pushes into one of these areas a decision has been made(possibly) that "I like the way this is going(i.e. trend) and I need an area to target my entry to continue with the trend" after this thought is made there comes a confirming though "If I were to enter at this area, that I believe is inexpensive, I stand to make a R:R of 1:1 or better" so these areas where price has turned in the past are looked at for future decisions(IMO).
But, this is not a hard and fast rule I am suggesting. I am looking to these areas as possible turning points with very good R:R if you target the next area in the trend.
It occurred to me that these zones must signify an area where the price became very 'cheap' or 'expensive' respectively. When price pushes into one of these areas a decision has been made(possibly) that "I like the way this is going(i.e. trend) and I need an area to target my entry to continue with the trend" after this thought is made there comes a confirming though "If I were to enter at this area, that I believe is inexpensive, I stand to make a R:R of 1:1 or better" so these areas where price has turned in the past are looked at for future decisions(IMO).
But, this is not a hard and fast rule I am suggesting. I am looking to these areas as possible turning points with very good R:R if you target the next area in the trend.