Disliked{quote} 1. 1 to 1 vs 1 risk 3 reward, the 3 reward has higher rewards 2. The above 1 risk 3 reward course needs less winrate than a 1 to 1 to make money which is my point to begin with. 3. Subjectivity. If you are profitable with your method then that's fine. As i became more profitable in reward 3 x the risk than reward 1 x the risk over all. I found this and it's a better computation in general. {image}Ignored
1:1 has a 50% chance and 51% win rate to cover
1:5 has a 10% chance and a 17% win rate to cover.
On the inverse, a 1:0.5 has a 75% chance and a 67% win rate to cover.
A higher reward to risk will always have much fewer trading opportunities as well.
2