Accumulative Profits Grid System | Page 150 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Grid (not grid system) or horizontal lines indicator 6 replies

Grid, Burst Grid, Grid Risk and Grid Profit 1 reply

Forgot how to add MA to Accumulative Distribution 3 replies

The Accumulative Swing Index (ASI) from 'New Concepts In Technical Trading Systems' 1 reply

Accumulative Swing Index Indicator for MT4 2 replies

Attachments: Accumulative Profits Grid System
Exit Attachments

Accumulative Profits Grid System

  • #2,981
  • Apr 23, 2016 6:23am Apr 23, 2016 6:23am
Quoting eramax
Dear All, After forward testing of this strategy method 1 for 3 weeks , i got this good results {image} EA settings {image} Statement is attached. {file}
Wow. I may have to try it out myself
  • #2,982
  • Edited 6:44am Apr 23, 2016 6:30am | Edited 6:44am
Quoting eramax
Dear All, After forward testing of this strategy method 1 for 3 weeks , i got this good results {image} EA settings {image} Statement is attached. {file}
Good Results,
But Notice:
1. That This Green Equity Line Is Not Showing The Real DD, (Because It Refresh The Green Line At Order Close , Not Order Open)
And In Sell Only, No Orders Closed Untill Equity > Balance.
So, The Green Line Will Seem Like It Makes Profits All The Time But It Is Not.
2. At 0.5pip step ,You Will Open Many Orders, Most Brokers Allow Only (150-200) Total Orders.
  • #2,983
  • Apr 23, 2016 8:15am Apr 23, 2016 8:15am
Quoting eramax
Dear All, After forward testing of this strategy method 1 for 3 weeks , i got this good results {image} EA settings {image} Statement is attached. {file}
Who needs method-2 with such performance
Actually the report shows only SHORT positions. I wonder what could happen if both directions were active.
Or even better if the EA was active on two separate charts with different magic number, one for SHORT and the other for LONG.
Quite amazing how many possibilities you could have with this EA.
And we are only talking about method-1
Full credit to Remon...
  • #2,984
  • Apr 23, 2016 8:39am Apr 23, 2016 8:39am
Quoting Ocsag
{quote} Who needs method-2 with such performance Actually the report shows only SHORT positions. I wonder what could happen if both directions were active. Or even better if the EA was active on two separate charts with different magic number, one for SHORT and the other for LONG. Quite amazing how many possibilities you could have with this EA. And we are only talking about method-1 Full credit to Remon...
I'd just like to point out that I have done extensive tests on Remon Fix Lot Anti Trend made by Voldemar and in a 1 year test, things looked all good. Then I put it to a 3 year test and found out that the DD was quite large but not only large but very constant. There are very little times where balance would meet equity.

Method 1 & 2 from Remon are quite crucial for his development because I too at one time thought that Part 1 of method 1 was sufficient to make profit but further testing have shown that it has huge drawbacks. Still the only problem of trending with little retracements.
  • #2,985
  • Apr 23, 2016 11:10am Apr 23, 2016 11:10am
Quoting eramax
Dear All, After forward testing of this strategy method 1 for 3 weeks , i got this good results {image} EA settings {image} Statement is attached. {file}
Eramax, what EA's you are using? I see one but are you using the last EA from Remon?
  • #2,986
  • Apr 23, 2016 11:33am Apr 23, 2016 11:33am
Quoting Ocsag
{quote} Who needs method-2 with such performance Actually the report shows only SHORT positions. I wonder what could happen if both directions were active. Or even better if the EA was active on two separate charts with different magic number, one for SHORT and the other for LONG. Quite amazing how many possibilities you could have with this EA. And we are only talking about method-1 Full credit to Remon...
Good.
  • #2,987
  • Apr 23, 2016 11:37am Apr 23, 2016 11:37am
Quoting keydcuk
{quote} I'd just like to point out that I have done extensive tests on Remon Fix Lot Anti Trend made by Voldemar and in a 1 year test, things looked all good. Then I put it to a 3 year test and found out that the DD was quite large but not only large but very constant. There are very little times where balance would meet equity. Method 1 & 2 from Remon are quite crucial for his development because I too at one time thought that Part 1 of method 1 was sufficient to make profit but further testing have shown that it has huge drawbacks. Still the only...
OK.
  • #2,988
  • Apr 23, 2016 12:34pm Apr 23, 2016 12:34pm
Quoting remon78eg
{quote} Yes, 1. We Will use "extern" Not "input" So We Can Change It, 2. Before Check The ini File We Will Check Global Variable To Know If New Changes Or Not, And Change It To Block Sign To Prevent Any Modification In The ini (From Indicator) While Reading It. 3. Also The Check Will Be Every (1-3) Second, No Every Tick.
remon78eg:

Correct, I meant to say every millisecond not tick. Cause with a tick as much as 3 minutes can pass before the next one.
Our AWESOME IMAGINATION is the true holy grail!
  • #2,989
  • Apr 23, 2016 12:48pm Apr 23, 2016 12:48pm
Quoting xmess7
{quote} remon78eg: Correct, I meant to say every millisecond not tick. Cause with a tick as much as 3 minutes can pass before the next one.
OK.
  • #2,990
  • Edited 3:11pm Apr 23, 2016 2:58pm | Edited 3:11pm
Quoting eramax
Dear All, After forward testing of this strategy method 1 for 3 weeks , i got this good results {image} EA settings {image} Statement is attached. {file}
Those settings are complete Absurd! What you mean Grid step 5? that's 0.5 PIP? Sell only?

Explain to me why open 0.01 trade every 0.5 pip and pay slippage, when you can open 0.2 lot every 10 pips?,

what is the f* difference? Handle cash to broker? 100 orders by say 20 (2 pips) Slippage that's just 200+- PIPS to brokers profit and to your loss.

GJ made 300 pips move few days ago, so how many orders you will get? 500?

Not sure you understand what you are doing..

Try to do that with the real money, bro.. It's just complete nonsense.. Step 0.5 pip and Slippage 3 pips
  • #2,991
  • Edited 3:16pm Apr 23, 2016 3:01pm | Edited 3:16pm
Quoting zigler
{quote} Those settings are complete Absurd! What you mean Grid step 5? that's 0.5 PIP? Sell only? Explain to me why open 0.01 trade every 0.5 pip and pay slippage, when you can open 0.2 pip every 10 pips, what is the f* difference? Handle cash to broker? GJ made 300 pips move few days ago, so how many orders you will get? 500? Try to do that with the real money, bro.. It's just complete nonsense.. Step 0.5 pip and Slippage 3 pips

he must have one digit broker
  • #2,992
  • Apr 23, 2016 4:18pm Apr 23, 2016 4:18pm
Remon78eg, thank you for so generously contributing. Your idea and sample software is great.

I have one thought... does anyone know if there an indicator or script to work out the % retracement (because retracement is when we can 'cash out' on this method) over time. eg. if you set the grid size input to say 30 pips, it would calculate how many 30 pip retracements over X periods.

I am thinking it can help optimise the grid size. This technique works best in ranging markets, and if the grid height is optimised, then any market can be seen to be ranging (of course it may take longer and be wider). Maybe it is good way to optimise -- even dynamically -- the grid size over time.

I'd also be interested in applying this to other instruments, not just forex.
  • #2,993
  • Apr 23, 2016 4:52pm Apr 23, 2016 4:52pm
Quoting zigler
{quote} Those settings are complete Absurd! What you mean Grid step 5? that's 0.5 PIP? Sell only? Explain to me why open 0.01 trade every 0.5 pip and pay slippage, when you can open 0.2 lot every 10 pips?, what is the f* difference? Handle cash to broker? 100 orders by say 20 (2 pips) Slippage that's just 200+- PIPS to brokers profit and to your loss. GJ made 300 pips move few days ago, so how many orders you will get? 500? Not sure you understand what you are doing.. Try to do that with the real money, bro.. It's just complete nonsense.. Step 0.5...

zigler, Never Mind,
eramax, Thanks For Your Test, Whatever The Settings/Results.
  • #2,994
  • Apr 23, 2016 4:57pm Apr 23, 2016 4:57pm
Quoting r2997790
Remon78eg, thank you for so generously contributing. Your idea and sample software is great. I have one thought... does anyone know if there an indicator or script to work out the % retracement (because retracement is when we can 'cash out' on this method) over time. eg. if you set the grid size input to say 30 pips, it would calculate how many 30 pip retracements over X periods. I am thinking it can help optimise the grid size. This technique works best in ranging markets, and if the grid height is optimised, then any market can be seen to be ranging...

Thanks,
Also, Method2 Is Good In Trend.
  • #2,995
  • Apr 23, 2016 5:49pm Apr 23, 2016 5:49pm
just run chart or account with method 1 and the other with method 2. that covers all bases!
one works when ranging and method 2 when trending and you get a good average of profit!
  • #2,996
  • Apr 23, 2016 8:22pm Apr 23, 2016 8:22pm
Quoting Paris Hilton
just run chart or account with method 1 and the other with method 2. that covers all bases! one works when ranging and method 2 when trending and you get a good average of profit!
Did you try it?
If so, can you give more details about your parameters and EA names?
Thanks!
  • #2,997
  • Apr 23, 2016 10:20pm Apr 23, 2016 10:20pm
I haven't tried it but it seems to make sense. One method makes money in ranging and 2 method makes money in trending.
As long as they make more than they lose it could work.
  • #2,998
  • Apr 24, 2016 3:22am Apr 24, 2016 3:22am
Quoting eramax
Dear All, After forward testing of this strategy method 1 for 3 weeks , i got this good results {image} EA settings {image} Statement is attached. {file}

bcause only sell ?
  • #2,999
  • Apr 24, 2016 3:27am Apr 24, 2016 3:27am
I have BT eu 2014 with all versions here - big fall. 100% No-loss system simply does not exist.
  • #3,000
  • Apr 24, 2016 7:18am Apr 24, 2016 7:18am
Quoting Paris Hilton
just run chart or account with method 1 and the other with method 2. that covers all bases! one works when ranging and method 2 when trending and you get a good average of profit!
Yes,
Good Suggestion,
Already I'm Working On It Now,

A Multi Pair Version!!
Has Many Windows In One Chart,
Every Window Can Manage Different Or Same Pair, With Other Settings,

We Can Use EUR/USD Method1, EUR/USD Method2 Together,
The Profits Can Be Combined Or Separated As We Want.
2 traders viewing now