USD-CAD
1
Elliott Wave Trading by Ayax 2,101 replies
Elliott wave trading 94 replies
elliott wave trading channel 22 replies
Group Trading based on Elliott wave and Harmonics 0 replies
Elliotters..Elliott Wave Trading 9 replies
DislikedHi Aalperbk, was looking with interess You Daily count for Dax. Could You update The chart after The Big drop of yesterday? Tnk.Ignored
Disliked{quote} hi Paul.. 1st) Because of the last wave. It is an impulsive wave not a corrective. Only the (c) wave in a-b-c can have 5-3-5-3-5 structure.And it is a very important rule that wave c always has to be impulsive. Some times you can see wave c in ending diagonal formation (3-3-3-3-3) structure.(but it is also an impulsive wave). 2nd) wave (b) has touched the fib %50 of wave (a).For a-b-c wave b has to be min fib%50 of wave (a). {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi, I understood in case in which the last wave is not impulsive , it can be labelled wxyxz else when the last one is impulsive a-b-c structure is more appropriate,dont I? {image} --------------------------------------------------- Another question : Here (w) is zig-zag with sub-waves (a)-(b)-(c) . When (a) and (c) are both impulsive , why only (c) has 5-3-5-3-5 structure , but (a) is labelled w-y-x ?..... {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} hi infinitus , Man , I guess you have to understand firstly difference between how to use percent and fibonaacci ratios for calculation.Percent shows you a specific level in wave (a) for wave (a) but fibo ratios shows you a specific level in wave (a) for possibilities of wave (b). For calculation of percent of wave (a), your start point (I mean "0") is the start of wave (a) and your end point is (I mean "1") end of the wave (a).But for calculation of fibonacci ratios for wave (b) in wave (a) your start point (I mean "0") is the end of the...Ignored
Disliked{quote} 1 st) You understood right.But not only the last wave is impulsive or not also you have to pay attention to fibo ratios. b wave has to touch min %50 of a , wave c cant be bigger than fib exp 1.618% of wave a-b. All situations have to mach it is very important.. 2nd) Because subwave a of wave w has w-x-y combination structure . For to be wave 2, as wave b has to touch min fib %50 of wave 1. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Pardon me for insisting here: again, there is no place in EWP where such a rule, neither a guideline exists so I ask you again: what rules and guidelines are you using?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi, I understood in case in which the last wave is not impulsive , it can be labelled wxyxz else when the last one is impulsive a-b-c structure is more appropriate,dont I? {image} --------------------------------------------------- Another question : Here (w) is zig-zag with sub-waves (a)-(b)-(c) . When (a) and (c) are both impulsive , why only (c) has 5-3-5-3-5 structure , but (a) is labelled w-y-x ?..... {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} My friend don't be angry I am just sharing my experience as a user of ew rules in many years successfuly. you asked me I just answered. Rules or guideline how you say is same in everywhere.if b is not min %50 it is not wave b something else( this is the main information for determine a-b-c or w-x-y when the second wave has ended) . And if wave c is bigger than fib 1.618 it is not c it is impulsive(3th wave in 5 waves) . Ofcourse there are few formations where are main rules are broken like leading and ending diagonals.But they are not about...Ignored
Disliked{quote} My friend don't be angry I am just sharing my experience as a user of ew rules in many years successfuly. you asked me I just answered. Rules or guideline how you say is same in everywhere.if b is not min %50 it is not wave b something else( this is the main information for determine a-b-c or w-x-y when the second wave has ended) . And if wave c is bigger than fib 1.618 it is not c it is impulsive(3th wave in 5 waves) . Ofcourse there are few formations where are main rules are broken like leading and ending diagonals.But they are not about...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Aalperbk, now we are talking :-) Sorry, I am in the mountains with very poor Internet today because of snow/storm. I noticed only now, that you gave the document. Our friends from Elliottwave-forecast.com, which do outstanding work, use their own version of Elliott Wave. They have defined their own rules and guidelines besides the ones the original EWP gave. I think their version of Elliot Wave has some advantages, but also some disadvantages (out of my sight). The disadvantages come often with the extensive use of WXY(XZ), which makes...Ignored