DislikedHi Miza,
quick question:
Prechter says, that Fibs are very good to use to determine the movements in one wave, but that the fib relationship between waves is poorly to predict.
How is that in Harmonic?
Prechter says that EW trumps fibs.
Murrey says that Murrey Math trumps fibs.
What is your view?
Best to you, MarkusIgnored
Disliked[size=5]
ur questions.. i can explain on this weekedn if i free.. ok markus...
u r good friend... I love everyone too!!!Ignored
as my promise..
but just simple word...
harmonic is just inserting at waves counts in EW
using Fibonacci for retracement and projection is good
so we got 2 confirmations from 2 different analysis: EW and Harmonic
let say we got double correction that labeled as WXY
then plus occur at the same time/place with any harmonic pattern
more confident to know the termination point, so trading with Buy pullback, Sell Rally method.., least risky, more win and more profits
DislikedHi Miza,
hope all is well :-)
Did you like your trip to Europe?
Miza, we have 100% diametral views of the markets. I think we will witness in the next days/weeks, who is right. Sentiment data supports more my view.
In my view the top was 2008 at 1.6x, since then we are in a downtrend. Either we form here a very broad ABC down with target around parity (my preffered count), r Prechter is right with his even more bearish view of a big impulse down from 1.6x.
But what is most important right now is, that most of us Elliotticans think,...Ignored
DislikedHi Miza,
take a second lok at your z-wave:
in an wxyxz mive, all the waves are ABC's, but you labeled the z-wave as impulse. In Prechter-EW not possible, do not know if Neowave or Harmonic allows for........
Best to you and have a nice weekend,
MarkusIgnored
i know triple in EW got 4
ZZ F F
Zz F TG
F F F
F F TG
WXY on that chart.. i got so many counts and charts ..so.. my bad
Attached Image