DislikedI can't find any instructional material on Neely River Theory....Ignored
But he does give some free trial on river theory but only on tradestation platform.
Neely's NeoWave on €$, DXY, DAX & Bund: analysis & trades 203 replies
FX5 Neely Elliott Wave Indicator 0 replies
Neely River Theory indicators/EA 2 replies
DislikedYour english is perfectly fine Yep, I understand what you're saying.
Have you read any other books on Wave Theory that you might recommend?Ignored
DislikedI have read NeoWave by Glenn Neely and it is very difficult and very technical and probably not necessary to understand Elliot. I am not an expert and I am not sure there really is an all in one expert, RN himself said in his letters to Collins, that only those people who were personally trained by him were qualified. RN's Boigraphy is facinating reading. Elliot was the coolest account/spy/consultant/analyst I have ever heard of.
In regards to a book. the best book I have ever read for understanding Elliot is
"Applying Elliot Wave Theory Profitably" by Stven Poser
This book covers everything and is great at explaining for someone who is not a EW theorist.
Another great book for the bio and all of Elliots letters and essays is
"RN Elliots Masterworks the difinitive collection" It is acutally 5 books in one in Elliott's one hand. and arrange by Prechter, JrIgnored
DislikedOkay this thread can die now for another year until someone else buys the book and does an inquiry here.
It would be nice if someone who completely and confidently understood neowave would keep the thread alive and share imput with the rest of us so we can all learn, so far it seems nobody fits this description and we are all confused, some more than others.Ignored
DislikedHaha... I'll be back soon.
.... Hopefully.
smjones - you wouldn't happen to have an ebook copy of "Applying Elliott Wave Theory Profitably" so that I can have a look through it??Ignored
Dislikedhaha... nooo, of course not, I wouldn't do that.... it's merely to 'preview' the book, prior to purchasing itIgnored
DislikedIs there a book called Neely made simple? or Neowave for dummys?
They say the best way to learn it is to teach it, so maybe I should teach Neowave, Let me study for one year and then I will teach it, or find it overly complex (already there) and then give up on it like smjones
No disrespect smjones I completely understand your discussion to donate the book to charity as I may do the same after one year.Ignored
DislikedElliott theorists are nearly insane with anger when others do not agree with them,Ignored
DislikedIf anyone is taking anything Marketwavez posts up seriously...is stupid. Plain and simple. Learntocount actually has some Elliott Wave ability.
That being said, I'm a NeoWave follower :-DIgnored
DislikedSo out all some odd thousand members in F.F there are only 5 neowavers, and out of 5 only 1 can comprehend at least 10% of it. Brilliant, more reason to study it. I would really like to learn it, I just don't want to pay $6,000 for the lessons so I guess I'm on my own here.Ignored
DislikedSo out all some odd thousand members in F.F there are only 5 neowavers, and out of 5 only 1 can comprehend at least 10% of it. Brilliant, more reason to study it. I would really like to learn it, I just don't want to pay $6,000 for the lessons so I guess I'm on my own here.Ignored
DislikedI don't understand what's so hard about it. You guys are making it harder than it is. I agree it is more comprehensive then contemporary Elliott Wave, but I've taken Physics and Calculus courses that were harder than NEoWave.
:-/Ignored
DislikedHow do you guys interpret the rules for confirming m3, m2, m0, m(-1), m(-2)....
Is the requirement that a monowave must break a previous high/low on either the first or second attempt?? If this is the case, then I'm constantly getting 7 wave monowaves, which I find quite odd.
What are the guidelines???Ignored
DislikedI am spending a week up in my chalet in the Alps, I am bringing the book to study in between snowboarding and drinking, I think the whole week could be spent on chapter 3 alone.Ignored