Let me know if any one wants their trade explorers connected to this thread. I will connect the explorers.
Blessing Multipair EA 449 replies
Can anyone convert the Blessing 3 v3.9.6.09 into MT5? 9 replies
Blessing EA by ananthhh 13 replies
'Blessing' EA Modification Wanted 3 replies
Forward testing results of my ea modified from Blessing 3.9.6 18 replies
DislikedHi, There is different way to make this EA works great on Live Account. 1- if you have one demo account working good then you can use one Trade copier to copy the trades. ( There is different solution out on the net) 2- Have one good broker I'm testing #1 and #2 and will let you know how it goes. Running 3 live accounts. 1K + 1K + 3KIgnored
Disliked{quote} What is the point of it. It works better on live than on demo usually. So how will copying trades from demo make it more good.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Some EA's works good on Demo and bad on Live accounts. So you run the EA on Demo and copy to Live all trades. Of course i EA doing good or better on Live then no point to copy the trades. Btw if someone have one account doing good then all those trades can also be dispatched to other accounts.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Latency (yeah, I'm an IT guy) is a crucial factor in copy trading and hence that adds a certain degree of risk. However, if you think this is the right path for you, no one is keeping you from doing it. I personally won't do it considering there are still other factors to consider on your idea.Ignored
DislikedHey cdsaa, Pretty nice EA and set files. thanks for that!! I much enjoy playing around with stuff like these Here's a simple set file for a $100-$200 account you can play around with. XAUUSD - 1minute It's 0 multiplier but can double your account in a month, well as far as tester goes for July 2018. Only using 0.01 lot (1 lot@nano) About 50% DD using a $100 capital so if you put in 200-300 bucks then you're good to go. I'm using a new machine with a freshly installed EA so not much data history yet. And i'm too lazy to run it with good modeling...Ignored
DislikedAnd i'm too lazy to run it with good modeling quality test as it takes much time to switch machine and all. {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} But for signal pattern this EA uses, MA or CCI or BB or MACD, are never good on M1 timeframe. Minimum timeframe one can look at is M5. But hope your setfile is working on longer duration. 1 month test is too small to say if it is good. idea sounds good to have it on smaller account size. right multiplier. but number of levels to open and breakeven have to be balanced as well.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Sorry to say this but the market isn't too kind for those being lazy - it will show you no mercy. Plus almost everything will look good on "Fastest" modeling quality (see screenshot) - that is just part of my excel file of tests of 2 year 1M tick data and comparing the model quality of fast vs every tick (and respective spreads of 15 and 20). {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I disagree, if you did your due diligence, your risk is calculated.Ignored