- Search Forex Factory
- 7 Results
- tacticat replied Aug 29, 2014
Sorry, I fail to see how you can prove that. Unless you refer to very simple martingale techniques. Look at this: image These are the equity evolution of two systems. operating quite frequently on 32 pairs. - 1st one (red) is a system whose entry ...
- tacticat replied Aug 17, 2014
[quote=Magix;7680035] Looks very nice, tac. [quote] But it's only martingales... and there is not yet enough data to determine if it's worth to run with real money. I've run only 2 times with real money just to verify the differences with demo in 2 ...
- tacticat replied Aug 17, 2014
And that's the reason I want to run many instrument and in both directions and in different levels. I need to 'stabilize' the combined outcome. With a short-period cycle of a month it's usually the opposite! When I see the equity going down I see ...
- tacticat replied Jul 27, 2014
Hi everybody. Two months ago I opened a demo account (1000€) with the EA. Operating at double volume than the 'recommended' setting. This is the balance-equity so far: image To notice: 1) So far system is well-behaved as per the definition in post ...
- tacticat replied Jul 25, 2014
So far so good. Well ... not yet. Requirements 2 (many instruments), 3 (many operations), 4 (frequent stops), 6 (SL/TP) and 7 (civilized operation) seem validated. Unfortunatedly the most important requirements, 1 (profit) and 5 (DD) are still to be ...
- tacticat replied Jul 24, 2014
The image shows the EA performance since it started in a real account (some 40 hours). Blue is the balance, Red de equity. A drop in the blue line is a stop. We had a stop today . Stops should be that size (not exactly that size of course because ...
- tacticat replied Jul 18, 2014
C'mon, all systems (even those winning consistently) are made of rules. Probably too complicated to be recognized as such, probably too many to be able to comprehensively list them but rules is standard way to describe any decision-making system. If ...
- Posts by Member Search: 'tacticat'