- Search Forex Factory
- 51 Results
- ronmatzkin replied Aug 10, 2008
Chet Chet — Before i even test the indicator, before I read the comments of the other members and before I look into the code - well done and thank you. I know you made a hugh research and learned a lot - coding and logically wise. Well done ...
- ronmatzkin replied Aug 10, 2008
By the way — I just saw the posts about me disappearing I promise you that I am thinking about this thread, the EI and the indicator every day - unfortunately I am working in crisis mode for the past few months. Once I have time I will try ...
- ronmatzkin replied Aug 10, 2008
Back in town... — Hi guys, I came back to you and am making my way from page 127 to the last one. Hopwfully I can get updated and then post more replies. See you around.
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 19, 2008
If we work according to the orginal system, the right way would have to use an opening of a candle (EMA25 in opening of a candle + RSI and MACD at the close of the last candle) - this is the safest way. We can always improve the indicator - keep ...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 18, 2008
And also - TP and SL will always be repainted since they are based on the current/close price - this is the only way. Regarding the open of a trade - read my last post. Thank you all for keeping me working - it would have been hard to do it alone...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 18, 2008
Ok, lets assume I will use the open of a bar for the above/below 25EMA - this part of the logic will remain constant. The only thing that could change is the indicators - RSI and MACD. If we will take these values from the last bar then we will have ...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 18, 2008
Well, that's why we use the opening of a bar - because it is usually equal to the close of the last candle...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 18, 2008
Yes, an opening of a trade is based on a new candle (open of a candle). Closing or taking profit is based on the current/close price.
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 17, 2008
Well, when I started with the indicator I knew that the main problem would be that the indicator is running on a snapshot of the bars. Meaning, the indicator can't be accurate when it doesn't know what came before what... The only real and true ...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 16, 2008
I have incorparated the change five minutes ago here is the final version - if you would like to fix stuff in it let me know so I will add it to the original version. file
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 16, 2008
Yeah, you are right, I left it as it is since I came to the conclusion it is better... Thanks for the output.
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 15, 2008
Yes, you are right. But this version allows you to use fixed or ATR SL and TP, the ATR multiplier nad other options so you can test it. I hope to have the time to write an EA finally and then it will be easier...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 15, 2008
Version 1.6 — Attached version 1.6 - here are the changes: 1. Adding multiple TP in one candle. 2. Fixed moving SL when TP was reached when using ATR levels as SL and TP. file please review and comment (Hopefully iwill have a quite day today ...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 15, 2008
Hi Toniari, I will integrate some of your changes to my version 1.6 and send you the result. I will merge the following: 1. 24 periods ATR insted of a 100 ATR. 2. Multiple TP in one candle just in a different way - the most profitable TP will be ...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 15, 2008
Hi, it is never to hard, it is just a matter of time - which I do not have right now I will get to it once I have the time, please just change the name of the indicator and the version so I can continue my developments in my version line... sorry ...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 15, 2008
What exactly is the problem?
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 15, 2008
Well, I am in the hi-tech field - we had a long period of 9-5 working hours but the last four weeks were hell so I dont have time to do anything but work. Hopefully we will finish this crisis period and I will have time to invest more time in the ...
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 10, 2008
Oops, you are correct. I think the only way to support trailing SL when using ATR it to use both SL and TP based on ATR - can you tell me your planned logic for using TP based on ATR?
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 10, 2008
I think it is possible to change the code to support multiple TP in one bar - I will try to do that.
- ronmatzkin replied Jul 10, 2008
Unfortunately I do not have time for the profit calculator right now but I have added an ATR based SL to the code? What is the logic of the TP based on ATR?