- Search Forex Factory
- 14 Results
- piotrek_FX replied May 3, 2010
Hmm... Indeed, this is very interesting. Unfortunately I wasn't unable to replicate this behavior in my backtests, so this might be just lucky coincidence. Also, I think I'm getting too much credit here "My EA" is the EA that you posted as "6x6" ...
- piotrek_FX replied May 2, 2010
True, you could also divide by smaller number and result would be exactly the same. But to be honest I find multiplier more logical solution. Anyway, using /5.6 would yield same results as using /6 with RangeMultiplier=1.071. Have fun during rest of ...
- piotrek_FX replied May 2, 2010
I've added RangeMultiplier which allows one to widen / shorten price range that was originally calculated. You should use something like 1.05 or 1.1 to match yours. Oh, btw: it's Piotrek, with "r"
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 23, 2010
Well, I'm software developer, so I believe that everything that has clear rules can be automated
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 23, 2010
Please find attached version that I've used for my backtesting. Levels are a little different than on your indicator (about 5%), because I've used difference between highest and lowest value in the last 120 periods, so it doesn't include "screen ...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 23, 2010
Looking at the charts I see long term trend after the losing trade is taken and not sudden spike, so I'm not really sure if this was consequence of any news... Not yet, but I'll make sure to study it closely. Thanks! I'll try to code and verify this ...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 23, 2010
Here are my backtests for v5a. It works a lot better, but first 4 months of 2009 were still rather weak. I've also noticed that you're doing your backtests since May of 2009, so that's why you don't see those "bad times" on your graph. Please note ...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 23, 2010
Correct. Few updates ago MetaQuotes disabled import of FXT files, so you need loader (or mq4 script) to use them. Everything is described here: http://eareview.net/tick-data
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 22, 2010
Hehe, that's what I thought as well, but I run some tests and: - closing trade when it reaches 3rd level is a suicide (it cuts so many trades that would have been otherwise profitable, that it's just ridiculous), - closing trade when it reaches 4th ...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 22, 2010
You need to place data in your MT4/tester/history folder, so it must be on the same HDD. Also, make sure that you mark every generated FXT file as read-only, otherwise MT4 will remove it if you forget to use the loader...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 22, 2010
The problem described in previous post is illustrated here (I don't know why there is no arrow on the chart, but BUY order was placed when price went below blue line). image As you can see, the price never pulled back, so it was generating loss ...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 22, 2010
Hello, first off, Kudos for all the great work you've done! EAs found in this and your other thread are really impressive and are the best I ever saw! Same goes to 6x6 system (and EA). I just backtested EA with little modifications of mine, so it ...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 19, 2010
Here: http://www.dukascopy.com/swiss/english/data_feed/historical/ You can read more about how to convert and use this data here: http://eareview.net/tick-data Well, the fact is that people don't get the same results on LIVE accounts as when they ...
- piotrek_FX replied Apr 19, 2010
Hello guys, I just backtested this system for 2009 using Dukascopy's historical tick data (99% modeling quality) and results are little worse than expected... I tested both geoffb's and Steve's EAs with default settings using different start_hour: - ...
- Posts by Member Search: 'piotrek_FX'