- Search Forex Factory
- 24 Results (1 Thread , 23 Replies )
- Robinson replied Aug 26, 2010
You're seriously claiming that it is absolutely wrong of me to expect a decent notice (at this point, ten minutes will do) for most of the trades? Seriously? It's a rare occurrence that Nick knows the entries half an hour before hand? I've NEVER had ...
- Robinson replied Aug 26, 2010
Well, I'm happy for you. But I'd like to think I value logic enough to rather ram scattered glass down my urethra than let positivity trump reason. Don't hold it against me. Well, obviously you wouldn't. How could you with such an upbeat ...
- Robinson replied Aug 26, 2010
For as long as I have to execute it within ten seconds of delivery, it's no trade at all. That is not viable -- unless automated. Your calls are good. It's too bad it's completely random whether they can be acted upon. You're ruining a great thing ...
- Robinson replied Aug 26, 2010
Jesus, Nick. I got the signal, checked the charts ten seconds after and it's already gone. I know you can't give an hour notice, we've established that, but how about 30 seconds notice, can you manage that? I'm not plunking down $100 for this ...
- Robinson replied Aug 19, 2010
That is good to hear.
- Robinson replied Aug 19, 2010
Everything you just said rings true to me. Matches my experiences exactly. I'll probably be a subscriber for one more month before I make up my mind. I think it would serve Nick well to explicitly inform his prospective subscribers about the kind of ...
- Robinson replied Aug 19, 2010
You've probably seen me be very critical of Nick's latest shenanigans and I still maintain that the way he omitted his inital call from the trade records, on the call prior to this, was an outrageos show of dishonesty and paints the very idea of ...
- Robinson replied Aug 17, 2010
I'd love to get a front end to my broker on my iPhone. That would definitely be a big help.
- Robinson replied Aug 17, 2010
I appreciate that but I have no problem with losing trades. No qualms there. They’re bound to happen. I was commenting more on how the signals are delivered. Virtually all the signals I’ve gotten required action that very second. It's down to dumb ...
- Robinson replied Aug 17, 2010
*sigh* No notice this time either. I literally have to sit on standby, my finger on the mouse to take these signals.
- Robinson replied Aug 12, 2010
Well, I'm not sure who you're addressing but I'm guessing it's me. I've never criticized Nick for providing updates. I change my mind the minute I get a reason to and can only hope that Nick does too, and updates us. I criticized him for "erasing" ...
- Robinson replied Aug 12, 2010
If it was in fact meant for only those who didn't take the first trade, it was certainly not defined as such. Saying "oh, that was meant for those only," after the fact, is way too convenient. Taking that into account, I admit it's plausible that -- ...
- Robinson replied Aug 12, 2010
Well, the results for August 11th are up. Following the signals to a tee gave 120 points in losses while the results page shows 60 points. The long at 1.2965-55 is forgotten. Trading is easy when you shave off 50% of losses here and there. And no ...
- Robinson replied Aug 11, 2010
Nick, I have no concern over those previous signals and updates. I'm not entirely sure why you even wanted to bring them up. My concern is simply of the way you'll report this latest signal on the results page. The latest signal -- step by step -- ...
- Robinson replied Aug 11, 2010
08/02/2010 3:05 PM - Looking for short on G/U Order: 1.5895-1.5905 08/03/2010 9:03 AM - Update signal : as suggestion you can close your cable that already around your entry and try to take it again on 1.5940-50 07/21/2010 5:14 PM - Looking for long ...
- Robinson replied Aug 11, 2010
Are you talking about this particular signal or how many call updates I've gotten in general in my time as a subscriber? In case of the latter -- though I have no idea why this would matter -- probably around ten.
- Robinson replied Aug 11, 2010
I’m afraid this does not address the point tradaboo was raising. I just got stopped out as well. Nothing wrong with that at all. The issue is, that you changed the signal after the fact. Meaning, you will probably not count this as a loss, putting ...
- Robinson replied Aug 3, 2010
I'm not following your logic; it's not the same as the actual signal. See, actual signal goes like this: I get an SMS/email telling to get in at 1.000-1.010 and at this point the market is often trading at the said level, meaning I'll have to get in ...
- Robinson replied Aug 3, 2010
Heh. Well, I can certainly appreciate the impossibility of pleasing everyone I think even a quick heads up via email before the actual signal would be a big help. Maybe others could chime in, and if enough people agree then take it under ...