- Search Forex Factory
- 23 Results
- HurryK replied Jul 27, 2018
Thanks for sharing Robby, I'll try it out, looks promising.
- HurryK replied Oct 11, 2017
So which pair is best to trade for the FOMC?
- HurryK replied Oct 6, 2017
I dont believe coin tossing can be compared to trading, so I don't really see the point in doing so. But for the sake of argument, I think it can be proven quite easily that coin tossing should not be compared to markets, by the following ...
- HurryK replied Oct 5, 2017
I don't understand your proces of generating a candlestick with pseudo-tick data. Either way, there will always be an underlying distribution. It's easy enough to check, simply generate a histogram of your dataset that generated in the candle. IF ...
- HurryK replied Oct 4, 2017
Valid point. However also setting Open[i] = Close[i+1] results in a 33-33-33 distribution. Incedently I also find that the Close closes near the open around 10% of the time (within a 5% deviation of the open), meaning that in a truely random market ...
- HurryK replied Oct 4, 2017
I would say that a 25-50-25 distribution is a statisticly significantl deviation from the 33-33-33 random distribution. So my conclusion would indeed be that markets are not (completely) random. This in itself is an important statement, I feel. ...
- HurryK replied Oct 4, 2017
Spot on! I used the standard Random function of excel, hence the distribution used is uniform.
- HurryK replied Oct 4, 2017
Admittedly I did not. However that doesn't change the statement that the markets have a 25%-50%-25% wick-body-wick distribution.
- HurryK replied Oct 4, 2017
Based on this distribution I came up with a simple expirement to prove markets are NOT (completely) RANDOM. Probably this experiment has been done before, but never the less here it is. I thought to double check this statement based on GPBJPY over ...
- HurryK replied Jun 23, 2017
thanks for sharing your system! would love to revieve your previous newsletter as well.
- HurryK replied Jun 17, 2017
looks impressive. one thing i can think of on real account are issues with execution times of your orders. In demo they execute instantly, on real accounts you may experience drawdowns due to the lag. I guess maybe forward test this strategy also on ...
- HurryK replied Apr 20, 2017
Cool stuff! But what happened to Fibonacci?
- HurryK replied Apr 4, 2017
no that wouldnt work, because when the timeframe is changed, a new time is generated, so you would lose the reference to the original object. it would need to be an ID that is unique but stays constant after re-initialization
- HurryK replied Apr 4, 2017
Hi Cja, thanks for your response. Setting the unique ID externally is something I use now, but its not pretty. I'd prefer the indicator to assign its own unique value, something like what ChartID does, except then for indicators... Maybe have any ...
- HurryK replied Apr 3, 2017
Hi, I have a tricky question for the more advanced MQ4 developers here. i'm writing an indicator that plots a symbol on the chart. From this symbol it will then draw a line through it in a particular way. When you select the symbol and move it ...
- HurryK replied Feb 14, 2017
Hi, I've been following your thread with interest. I'm trying to work out how to setup the Gann fans correctly, taking into account the zoom factor etc... I have a question though, in your analysis you often determine a possible price move to go ...
- HurryK replied Mar 30, 2016
thanks for sharing Atheer, love your work
- HurryK replied Mar 22, 2016
so how do you trade it?
- HurryK replied Mar 16, 2016
Hi Atheer, so can you explain a bit more about how you milk the trade? and let your profits run? cheers
- HurryK replied Mar 11, 2016
regarding chart 80 nr 1 and nr 3 are sell zones, should those be used as support? I suppose the 2 bottom green bars from the move up should be used as support zone. these lines up with zone 1. and also with the vibs 50%-61.8% if you measure the ...