Disliked{quote} I agree with you it is just that i am trying to evaluate this system and in so doing i want to make sure i use the same heuristics as the author. So far i find the system's description somewhat vague in certain areas. The entry is clear but all the rest of the qualifiers are fuzzy at best. When i read you need to read price in the current developing context, i totally agree with that but if i can do it well why would i need the Non Lag Dot when the most important factors are the parts of the iceberg (read system) below the waterline? Here...Ignored
the best entry was number 1 , 2 is same direction of 1 no sense to take it , trade 3 I wouldn't take it bcz the price was still at the top which mean I wouldn't buy I would only search sell , number 4 is also sell and first sell was still alive.
In fact , you had 2 effective trades 1 sell second buy ( which I wouldn't take ).