I enjoy reading Teek's post as well.
I can agree or disagree, but I can see the logic.
It's a good practice, imho.
I can agree or disagree, but I can see the logic.
It's a good practice, imho.
4
MT4: how to change "EURUSD" to "#EURUSD"? 3 replies
Re: EurUsd short term 15 replies
did oanda just drop its spread for eurusd to 1 pip? 11 replies
EA for multiple lot limit order for EURUSD 0 replies
NFP nice bump up on EURUSD 2 replies
Disliked@Justin: This is the last time I answer to you. I just wanted to make this clear. First of all, I actualy had a very good week, very green. You don't seem to understand that I am only sitting on one tiny long that is aimed for the -very long run- and stopped at 1.038. My reason for this position I don't need to explain. Would you actualy read my content, you'd understand. But honestly, who cares if anyone understands what I think or do... This one position that I opned along the way does not mean that I did not trade the shorts. I am a priceaction...Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you eve used to watch sponge bob square pants, it's like plankton and the crabby patty formulaIgnored
Quoting Teek;9748008[BDisliked]I do not believe in Elliot waves!)[/b] First target would be @1.08040, scaling up at prices: (nope, not for the forum people) To open any long positions we must wait for the right signals in and around the Demand zones (Candlesticks! PA!) Short scenario: a PULLBACK to the 61.8% retracement is very possible and could create another short entry I don't recommend any more shorts before we see a pullback retest of the 61.8% retracement, }Ignored
Disliked{quote} For someone posting Fib ratios and yet claims does not believe in EW is like seeing the tail of the cat but not the whole animal.Fibs are intricate part of Elliot Waves. please read THE FIBONACCI SEQUENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONIgnored
Disliked{quote} It very well may be an intricate part, but not everyone uses the same fib levels. Which at the end makes it a variation of EW trading doesn't it?Ignored
Disliked@Justin: This is the last time I answer to you. I just wanted to make this clear. First of all, I actualy had a very good week, very green. You don't seem to understand that I am only sitting on one tiny long that is aimed for the -very long run- and stopped at 1.038. My reason for this position I don't need to explain. Would you actualy read my content, you'd understand. But honestly, who cares if anyone understands what I think or do... This one position that I opned along the way does not mean that I did not trade the shorts. I am a priceaction...Ignored
Disliked{quote} It very well may be an intricate part, but not everyone uses the same fib levels. Which at the end makes it a variation of EW trading doesn't it?Ignored
Disliked{quote} it is EW, if you use them properly not matter what numbers you have on them because EW, (or anything for that matter) is not, cannot and wont ever be an exact. of course you can use them how you want but not using them properly with inevitably bring poor results.Ignored
Disliked{quote} So what is the correct way to use it? I ask, because I have noticed many people claiming to using it, but I don't see any constant results which reveals it is a good form of trading. I'm not trying to spark a war, simply asking an opinion. I use fibs and only use only 3 actual numbers, which aren't the "normal" numbers which people claim to use. Would you agree that EW trading results in higher drawdown in pips, being as one is likely to enter on the extreme edges of a run?Ignored
Disliked{quote} most people measure fibs on individual swing or waves that are actually part of EW whiteout even realizing it..So saying 618 retracement of a swing is basically measuring a EW wave. I trade Fib pivots and I know and understand how deeply its connected to EW To me saying I don't believe in EW and using Fib retracement as a trading tool is missing the point by a mile and basically a ignorance.Ignored