I have just a technical question - when I compare the Excel drawing to other source P'n'F chart, it seems that the above Excel 100*3 chart almost matches the 100*4 on the other source, but definitively differs from the 100*3. Which is marking correct?
Hello Halley, i dont get ur question... Can u plz post a picture with ur questions..
Do u mean to which setting of 3 box reversals or 4 box reversal is correct..
As i have said i will come up with Point & Figure Charting for the sectors from BSE index..
Here is the BSE Bank sector with the historical data of more than 10 years.
Sometimes P&F amazes me how the whole sector itself respects the trend and channels..
As i have mentioned Wyckoff in the first post that how he used P&F with volume from Vertical charts, i will following this method more & more. Any mistakes or any potential things to learn plz do share the information.
ок. I think it not so usefull, as first Du Plessis book...
file is big and I can't attach it here. I put it on my yandex disk. https://yadi.sk/i/_MtrTogvrTxz7
I know only ten books about P&F.
Wane A. Thorp, A.W. Cohen, DeVilliers, T. Dorsi, Heinrich Weber, Richard Wyckoff. and in every these books al the same. Dorsi was the first I read about p&f and 70-80%% of his book repeat in others. I'm waiting for 2-nd DuPlessis book with great enthusiasm, I think that He give us something really new, but I was confused ))) No more news under the Sun...
book4you point org
3th edition and another Dorsey works. I use russian translate of the 2nd edition. no much differences between 2nd russian and 3rd english