yunben: can you upload the data (adjusted fill price and time of fill) ?
Have your ever heard about latency arbitrage? 137 replies
High speed traders - a history of latency arbitrage since 1790 1 reply
Latency Arbitrage in Metatrader 0 replies
broker latency studies 0 replies
Broker Server Latency 0 replies
Dislikedyunben: can you upload the data (adjusted fill price and time of fill) ?Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'm curious to see how they will handle this. And if it's really fair. I don't forget who pay them: The brokers ;( Good luck Ynben ! {quote} Unfortunately when I see how a lot of brokers behaved with the CHF event on the 15 january, including Oanda which I was trusting, I tend to think that mainly FOREX BROKERS = FRAUD.Ignored
DislikedYou bought 2.4M @ 0.93821 and they adjusted the price to 0.9400 and then you sold 2.4M @ 0.93812 and they adjusted the price to 0.9361 A 0.9 pip loss adjusted to a 39 pip loss? Is that correct?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you for your attention. So far my case is still under adjudication of FOS. At first, FOS support forex.com because they have the clause. But I check their post adjustments and find they actually use distorted data to steal my money (they use their GTX server data which is actually not consistent with dukascopy or LMAX data, this is the first time I saw the detail adjusted trades, they probably deliberately did it and don't want me know the details). I also argue that if I know the market well, there should be almost all negative adjustment...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yeah I was afraid that those regulators would side with the manipulative brokers. What timeframe of data do you need? I remember Dukascopy provides price data of any timeframe for download for free; you don't even need any demo account. I know because I used to use their data to adjust the corrupted price data provided by Ninja Trader (another angry story for another time and another post). Trust me, Yunben, after reading from this forum which is one of the biggest in retail forex industry, NOBODY will ever want to trade with Forex.com,...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks Forexia. can you please send me the dukascopy tick data? USDCHF and USDJPY during 2014-10-15 13:39:00 to 13:52:00Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks Forexia. can you please send me the dukascopy tick data? USDCHF and USDJPY during 2014-10-15 13:39:00 to 13:52:00Ignored
Disliked{quote} Here is where you can download all the historical data for any currency of any timeframe. https://www.dukascopy.com/swiss/engl...ch/historical/ You just specify the date and time range and you can download any data you want. Good luck!Ignored
Dislikedyou can also check Oanda tick data here: http://fxtrade.oanda.com/analysis/fxcompare You just need to fugure out the exact timestamps for Oanda (UTC i guess). P.S. have these been market orders or resting orders on the platform?Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you have budget I would recommend formal legal action, I know a very good litigator in london which would only charge you 5 k to get it started. PM me if you need some help on this front. I would not recommend the Ombudsman, horrible track record.Ignored
DislikedNot sure how, but i would try to get my hands on the GTX data. Sounds like BS that a multi-bank platform is so far off-market and not a single one of the LPs quotes a better price.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you for your attention. So far my case is still under adjudication of FOS. At first, FOS support forex.com because they have the clause. But I check their post adjustments and find they actually use distorted data to steal my money (they use their GTX server data which is actually not consistent with dukascopy or LMAX data, this is the first time I saw the detail adjusted trades, they probably deliberately did it and don't want me know the details). I also argue that if I know the market well, there should be almost all negative adjustment...Ignored
Disliked{quote} feeds from Oanda, Dukascopy and Lmax are consistent. Apparently forex.com use distorted data. They cheated. Based on Oanda data in seconds, I can claim back at least $12000-13000 from forex.com if they use so-called real data as feeds.Ignored
Disliked{quote} What i mean is that they are outright lying about their GTX feed. If you could somehow get the real data and send it to Ombudsman, it woould show how full of shit they are.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I have nothing to say. Bullshit Gain. Bullshit FOS. Both go to Hell gain said it uses third party price, then they privide its GTX price (not sure whether it is GTX price or not) to FOS, which is much different from dukascopy, lmax, and oanda. FOS support forex.com use distorted data and say "Although you have found the rates Gain used are not the most beneficial for you, I do not believe it had an obligation to adjust your account using different prices. " fellow traders, understand what FOS means? {image} {image} {image} {image} {image}...Ignored