Hey all,
I was thinking is it easy to produce a statiscally poor strategy (around <2%, <3%, <4%, <5%) and then reverse the concept to have >90% accuracy?
Just a thought....
Like to hear constructive opinions.
MM
EDIT: Maybe I've phrased this thread incorrectly, instead of "poor" the word I should have used is an "anomaly" or "rare" occasion.
Let me give a clearer example of what I actually mean...
Imagine you find a certain behaviour in price and measured it statiscally, and statistics showed it has a low probability to do X. Meaning you have an edge of what price won't do?
I was thinking is it easy to produce a statiscally poor strategy (around <2%, <3%, <4%, <5%) and then reverse the concept to have >90% accuracy?
Just a thought....
Like to hear constructive opinions.
MM
EDIT: Maybe I've phrased this thread incorrectly, instead of "poor" the word I should have used is an "anomaly" or "rare" occasion.
Let me give a clearer example of what I actually mean...
Imagine you find a certain behaviour in price and measured it statiscally, and statistics showed it has a low probability to do X. Meaning you have an edge of what price won't do?