Disliked{quote} Subscribe to get Indi .. Could you plz give me if you have ??Ignored
MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder
"Nihilist HolyGrail" EA 30 replies
Custom Indicators vs. Technical Indicators 6 replies
Nihilist trading 26 replies
Lagging Indicators -vs- Leading Indicators 48 replies
Disliked{quote} Subscribe to get Indi .. Could you plz give me if you have ??Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's the way Nihilist decided to share this indicator. If you have little respect for his work, you shouldn't request to somebody to go against the right way ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks a lot Hellee, those u marked in circle do i need to download them onlyIgnored
Disliked{quote} Hi Imifx, You don't seem to understand what is going on, I advise you to read the thread, there are various systems, so read the thread to understand what is going on and to see which one better suits you. We had a comment like this from a previous reader, here is an extract: "I have finally made it through all the pages of the thread! Only now do I realise how many times my first question posted here had been answered before! Thank you all for your patience." Do yourself a favor and read it. take careIgnored
DislikedLooking at entering LONG on this NZDUSD setup at the close of the H1 candle, there seems to be a good amount of momentum behind it on the indicators and a good number of pips to go to the next resistance area. Any comments? {image}Ignored
DislikedLooking at entering LONG on this NZDUSD setup at the close of the H1 candle, there seems to be a good amount of momentum behind it on the indicators and a good number of pips to go to the next resistance area. Any comments?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Piprocket, Nihilist doesn't recommend trading this below H4.Ignored
Disliked{quote} {quote} The system works well on H1 and perfectly on M30 but in this situation I would not take any trade until it sorts out. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I read the first post from Nihilist and he recommends using H4 and above. Can't say I've even looked below D1. Depends on the time you have to trade, I would rather check my charts at the End of Day (EOD) and take the appropriate action once a day, 15 minutes max. The shorter the TF people trade the more time required for house keeping. The shorter the TF people trade the less the returns in terms of your time per pip returned. {image}Ignored
DislikedThe shorter the TF people trade the more time required for house keeping. The shorter the TF people trade the less the returns in terms of your time per pip returned. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Firstly - for full time traders it is not so big tragic if they need much 'house keeping' as you put it. M30 is very well tradeable with 8 hours per day, which is quite usual working day. Secondly - the smaller the timeframe the smaller the SL and the bigger lots we can use. Even one trade per day with 5 pip profit can be enough for very good living. We have to make money here not pips EDIT: Under 'full time traders' I mean people who live from trading. It may very well mean that they spend only 15 minutes per day on charts but why not...Ignored
DislikedI have another question for the people in this forum. If you are using the method that Nihilist suggests, what is your average on pips that you usually get in a month with this 4H system? Just a number out of the ballpark! I use some Indicators from this system myself, but use a different trading system. Anyone care to share? D.Ignored
Disliked{quote} The thread was opened in the middle of July. Even if someone has been trading the system exactly by the rules from very beginning, there is no reliable data yet. A system must be traded systematically, on day to day basis, taking all possible entries for at least 6 months before making conclusions. But I doubt if anyone has been trading it exactly as put anyway. Which is right because every trader must find his/her own way, not copy what someone else is doing.Ignored
DislikedDear Indrek can you explain details how you use supply demand area for your trading decision.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Then why don't you answer yourself your own question by doing the 6 months testing ?Ignored