So the dog still at no 7 , now the zz start search for tech analize algo , great thank for the update . keep it well !
ECN && STP && Scalping && Hedging - Broker Review - Oct 2009 24 replies
Alert on Fractals (MT) 2 replies
Zigzag & Fractals 10 replies
EA wanted for sound alert depending on fractals condition 2 replies
Fractals Edge Fx 3 replies
Disliked{quote} Etecy, 1. No, because there was no confirmed ZZ near by, so the algo continues as usual. Once second signal is activated, there will be no "error" checking - because it will cause repainting. 2. We always count from the arrow - except in cases of "error" and the leg is not finished yet by another signal. G.Ignored
Disliked{quote} @ gg53 You have stated somewhere: "If, before finding the next probable swing point, I get an "error" prediction - I'm starting over the calculation from a confirmed MT4 ZZ." Can you please say when you check for an "error". Thanks so far.Ignored
Disliked{quote} My wording was wrong. If I have a fractal pattern match and the length falls "true" within the logic is there a number of bars previous and after (the fractal pattern match most recent bar) that I should be looking for a nextbar/currentbar pattern SET3 match? In other words you stated nextbar/currentbar pattern matching happens around the fractal/length requirement. I was wondering if you have any guidelines or restrictions for where this pattern occurs around the fractal/length requirement. Thanks!Ignored
DislikedSo the dog still at no 7 , now the zz start search for tech analize algo , great thank for the update . keep it well !Ignored
Disliked@gg53 Arrows on screenshot show ZZ end points that have not been repainted. Is the marked "2" last confirmed ZZ end point or "3" ? {image} Thanks a lot.Ignored
Disliked@ gg53 Thanks so far for the explanations. Would you please be so kind and show a screenshot from your indi where an "error" occured. And maybe mark the latest zz end from which your counting continued. Ignore if you asked too much. Thanks!Ignored
DislikedFractals, ZZ and the Renko bars (and don't forget the Pissing Dog...) The Renko version of the ForexGT_Arrow EA is finished (incl. Currency-Strength scanner and other supporting filters) . A major problem was the Backtesting of the Renko chart - which is always a problematic issue on almost all trading platforms. I think that we solved that issue too, and soon I'll post backtests results with at least 90% accuracy. Solving the Renko backtesting issue is a major cause of happiness here. Currently, the results of ForexGT_Arrow (Renko Ver.), EURUSD...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi G, Congratulation ... great result ... Can you explain how to use Renko to predict turning point ? So you do not use fractals and Zigzag for this ? And how to test it ? Thanks -GioIgnored
Disliked{quote} giovanni4000, Doing it on Renko requires additional steps. The logic is simple but the work is hard... Simply divide your Renko into smaller Renko's blocks. BackTesting Renko bars is a bitch... First D/L reliable Tickdata (try TickStory and data from Dukascopy). Erase offline MT4 .hst file and close MT4. Export to MT4 from TickStory. Start MT4 via TDS (TickDataSuite, Brit's creation). Create Renko offline chart using M1 and Renko EA (there are several EA's to choose from). Open Renko offline chart. Backtest now should show 99%+ accuracy....Ignored
Disliked... Length (bar count) - yes, it's the least important, BUT... You have to take into account large bars (pips wise) and not just the number of them, they are equivalent to two or three "regular" bars in other ZZ's. G.Ignored
Disliked{quote} gg and guys, Do we go back all the way to SET 1 and recount everything? Those two years worth of historic bars. The way I did SET 1, months ago, was I didn't treat long bars this way. No matter the length/pips, I just gave it 1 or 0 DNA.Ignored
Disliked{quote} gg and guys, Do we go back all the way to SET 1 and recount everything? Those two years worth of historic bars. The way I did SET 1, months ago, was I didn't treat long bars this way. No matter the length/pips, I just gave it 1 or 0 DNA.Ignored
Disliked{quote} SET1 (the long bars) needs to be recalculated too? I just need to be sure. I haven't the time yet to check this out but I'm anxious to know, anyone did the algo change yet and seeing improvements?Ignored
DislikedHello! G, Is this the same thing which Forex GT_Arrow calculates from the the history of pairs for swing points? I want to ask this for simplify my concept. Thank you. Regards, {image} {image}Ignored