DislikedI normally don't trade monday mornings but this one looked too temptingShort nzd/usd, target 60 pips, stop 30 pips. See how it goes, crash and burn is most likely outcome
Ignored
![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/1f60a.png?v=15.1)
Rags to Riches 21 replies
Rags To Riches 203 replies
rags to more rags.. and even more rags! 19 replies
Rags to rags and ice cream 36 replies
Rags To Riches Take 2 24 replies
DislikedI normally don't trade monday mornings but this one looked too temptingShort nzd/usd, target 60 pips, stop 30 pips. See how it goes, crash and burn is most likely outcome
Ignored
DislikedSeems I'm not able to cancel my previous undue posts. Please, anyone could help me to cancel them? ThanksIgnored
Disliked{quote} Click "edit" and remove your post, then "save" or simply click on "delete post".Ignored
Disliked{quote} On the top right corner of your post, you should have "edit", "quote" and "cleanup" ...Ignored
DislikedJust some food for thought on a dull Monday morning (it's very grey and dull here): if this is do-able for 11 winning trades, it should be do-able for 16 trades? Just a few more? I mean, why stop at 11?Starting at just $50 as suggested in this thread, after 16 trades, you will have $1,638,400. So if it can be done for 16 trades, then surely a few more? Well, get to 36 winners and you can pay off most of the UK national debt with $1.7 trillion
.
Ignored
DislikedJust some food for thought on a dull Monday morning (it's very grey and dull here): if this is do-able for 11 winning trades, it should be do-able for 16 trades? Just a few more? I mean, why stop at 11?Starting at just $50 as suggested in this thread, after 16 trades, you will have $1,638,400. So if it can be done for 16 trades, then surely a few more? Well, get to 36 winners and you can pay off most of the UK national debt with $1.7 trillion
.
Ignored
Disliked{quote} The theory is rock-solid. But in practice, you'd run into market liquidity problems after a number of net winning trades, obviously. Every additional winning trade would be hard on your psych/e as well, since you have to 'gamble' half the amount you expect to make. In your example, going from step 15 to 16, you'd place ~800k$ on a single trade - big brazen balls, yeah?Besides, you don't have access to the same kind of leverage with stakes this high, I think, so your progression might get slowed down for that reason too. I like the...
Ignored
Disliked{quote} You can split it up with many brokers and use a trade copier? For those with balls like watermelons, yesIgnored
DislikedJust some food for thought on a dull Monday morning (it's very grey and dull here): if this is do-able for 11 winning trades, it should be do-able for 16 trades? Just a few more? I mean, why stop at 11?Starting at just $50 as suggested in this thread, after 16 trades, you will have $1,638,400. So if it can be done for 16 trades, then surely a few more? Well, get to 36 winners and you can pay off most of the UK national debt with $1.7 trillion
.
Ignored
Disliked{quote} please re-read the post #1: " 10) What to do after making $50,000 After reaching $50,000 (or whatever you feel comfortable with), you should start trading lower leverage and lower risks. Here is what I would do, but you can do whatever you want. "Ignored
DislikedSimple question.. How many of you feel you can go 5 for 5 trades? can you win 5 in row?Ignored
Disliked{quote} The deal here isn't to make a sequence of winners in a row ... but X net winners.Ignored
Disliked{quote} sure, but to get to net win at some point ones got to mustard a few winners in row at 50% risk per trade deal..Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes of course but you only need few times 2 winners in row to reach your goal ... according to not have also few losers in row ! The important is that overall there's more winners than losers ... even if the sequence need 50 trades to achieve the X net winners.Ignored