Price closed within the 61-78% zone of larger swing.
Moved down, into 61-78% zone of smaller swing. PA stalled, showed signs of reversal.
it could have even been the D swing of a Gartley, but it would have still went up, regardless.
"Ratios & Harmonics: a Different Way to Trade." Summary 37 replies
Learning to trade with harmonics 11 replies
Time for Change - Pivots & Harmonics to freedom 67 replies
180 reasons to trade Harmonics and Patterns 13 replies
Disliked{quote} I just took another ABC aggressive trade, inside a Gartley, so its also an aggressive XABCD trade, am I correct ? ANd how does the trade look? {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} It meets all the rules of an aggressive ABC trade. Price closed within the 61-78% zone of larger swing. Moved down, into 61-78% zone of smaller swing. PA stalled, showed signs of reversal. it could have even been the D swing of a Gartley, but it would have still went up, regardless.Ignored
DislikedWould i be correct in saying this could be an aggressive c entry on the USDJPY daily? {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes it appears to qualify. It has some confluence in the zone and rejection at the RN. Personally I don't trade the Daily. If I did I'd have to know something about the fundamentals of the pair, and I don't. But as far as charts go it look like a descent entry, if it closes below the RN I'd be concerned.{image}Ignored
DislikedHere's a trade I will take. An ABCD completion in the C zone....if it gets there.{image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} similar. looking for this C ... red fib is the 61.8 {image}Ignored