Dislikedon Daily broke up the TL. on H4 broke up the range and sma200 held the retracement. until now seems to me that may get higher (sorry Cgb )Ignored
Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden interest [koran]
EurAnalysis Kindergarten 24 replies
Dislikedon Daily broke up the TL. on H4 broke up the range and sma200 held the retracement. until now seems to me that may get higher (sorry Cgb )Ignored
Dislikedand if u look at the cloud charts with 7,22,44, u will notice all the charts below daily are in uptrend,the reason for such is lagging line and price both are above the kumo(the cloud) that means only one thing price as more potential to up in the short term. and daily chart price and lagging line is under the cloud.very near to it and its going to expereince good resistance in the above area at 450 but even if price break the cloud on daily chart the fact that the lagging line still going to be under the cloud and to break that cloud by lagging...Ignored
Dislikedsorry drzakir, but i dont know what's "the cloud". can you please explain?Ignored
Dislikedsorry drzakir, but i dont know what's "the cloud". can you please explain?Ignored
DislikedHere's what I got today. Top sell @1.2430......for now.
I will wait patientlyIgnored
DislikedHere's what I got today. Top sell @1.2430......for now.
I will wait patientlyIgnored
DislikedMy plan would be to short it at 1.2430 as long as we have Risk Off on Tuesday. I think PipTrapper is correct about S&P closing below 1400.
So the question for me is when do I go short ? Not before 2:00 AM EST when Frankie wakes up. Then I will see if we have Green or RED at 3:00 when Europe Equities markets open and the money starts flowing.
Until then I recharge my batteries. Last night I slept at my office and went to bed at 9:00 PM EST and awoke at 2:00 AM. I am good tonight until 11:00 PM.Ignored
Dislikedthis is a cloud chart,at the very simple u just concentrate on lagging line and cloud and u will have ur trigger for long when lagging line cross above the cloud if its going up from below and and vice versa.to explain all the line is a bit complicated but dont worry about it u will be alright just following the above but with experience u will be better which signals to take.Ignored
DislikedCheck this 11 minute video out on next generation camera imaging!
http://www.wimp.com/trillionframes/
Ignored
DislikedCheck this 11 minute video out on next generation camera imaging!
http://www.wimp.com/trillionframes/
Ignored
DislikedCheck this 11 minute video out on next generation camera imaging!
http://www.wimp.com/trillionframes/
Ignored
DislikedI've seen this video few days ago, amazing innovation.
I always check the new photography tech, as it is my best hobby
I think I've never seen a creative idea like this one here
you take a shot, then ........... guess whatIgnored
Will he do it?
One reason he might is that Mitt Romney is singlehandedly pushing the entire debate about Israel and Iran to the right. The parameters have changed markedly. As TNI editor Robert Merry and others have noted, Romney's efforts to ingratiate himself with Jewish donors and voters have prompted him to suspend any notion of an independent American foreign policy in the Middle East.
Traditionally, the green or red light for military action has come from America, at least when it comes to actions that directly impinge upon American interests. Ronald Reagan, for instance, successfully demanded that Israel halt its attacks on Lebanon in 1983. Romney, by contrast, has effectively promised to give Israel a veto power over military action, indicating that he will do whatever Benjamin Netanyahu wants. As Romney observed in December, he would never, ever criticize Israel. Instead, he would get on the phone with Prime Minister Netanyahu and ask, "What would you like me to do?" So it's fair to say that Romney would outsource his foreign policy to Netanyahu when it comes to Israel and its enemies.
What's more, anyone who thinks that Romney is bluffing should think again. It's no accident that his senior adviser on the Middle East is Dan Senor, a hard-line neoconservative. As the New York Times notes today, Romney relies upon him for advice and frequently cites his book Start-Up Nation. Senor wasn't dissembling when he said in Israel that Romney was prepared to endorse an attack on Iran—he simply got a little ahead of the program.
The most effective way to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is for the international community to be united, proving to Iran that it will only make itself less secure if it continues to try to pursue a nuclear weapon.
This article was originally published at The National Interest
"In the US on September 11, 2011, the tenth anniversary of 9/11, politicians and their presstitute media presented Americans with “A Day of Remembrance,” a propaganda exercise that hardened the 9/11 lies into dogma. Meanwhile, in Toronto, Canada, at Ryerson University the four-day International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, came to a close at 5pm.
During the four days of hearings, distinguished scientists and scholars and professional architects and engineers presented the results of years of their independent research into all aspects of 9/11 to a distinguished panel consisting of the honorary president of the Italian Supreme Court who was an investigative judge who presided over terrorism cases and three distinguished scholars of high renown and judgment. The distinguished panel’s task is to produce a report with their judgment of the evidence presented by the expert witnesses.
The Toronto Hearings were streamed live over the Internet. I was able to watch many of the presentations over the four days. I was impressed that the extremely high level of intelligence and scientific competence of the witnesses was matched by a high level of integrity, a quality rare in US politics and totally absent in the American media...
As one whose own contributions to economics, now belatedly recognized, are “outside the box,” I am responsive to those who can escape peer pressure in order to advance truth. Here are some of the important things I learned from the Toronto Hearings.
The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency) reports on the twin towers and building 7 are fraudulent. Witnesses at the Toronto Hearings proved that building 7 was a standard controlled demolition and that incendiaries and explosives brought down the twin towers. There is no doubt whatsoever about this. Anyone who declares the contrary has no scientific basis upon which to stand. Those who defend the official story believe in miracles that defy the laws of physics.
A nano-chemist from the University of Copenhagen, who together with a scientific team spent 18 months investigating the chemical and physical properties of dust from the towers, found evidence of nano-termite in the dust and quantities of particles not naturally formed by office or normal building fires that indicate another explosive was also present.
These findings explain the extreme high temperatures that produced the molten steel for which indisputable evidence exists. In the orchestrated cover-up, NIST denies that molten steel is present as its presence is inconsistent with the low temperatures that NIST acknowledges building fires can produce.
Physicist David Chandler proved beyond all doubt that building 7 fell over its visible part (other buildings obscure the bottom floors) at free fall speed, an unambiguous indication that explosives had removed all supporting columns simultaneously.There is no possibility whatsoever according to the laws of physics that building 7 fell for the reasons NIST provides. The NIST account is a total denial of known laws of physics.
Many other powerful points were made at the conference that I will not report, at least not at this time, because the revelation of malevolence is so powerful that most readers will find it a challenge to their emotional and mental strength." (Continue reading article by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts)