DislikedOk, now this is interesting. So why did you decide to go that route instead of saying you've had more blacks so it's about time for another red.
I might be misreading this, I see so out of 18 spins you take the leader? Do you wait for all 18 before you make a bet? And what happens if you lose the bet, do you keep going according to the plan ie every 18, and would you double up (martingale)?
Edit: (thinking about it it's your edge so you might not want to say which is fair enough)Ignored
1. Martingale is sure suicide. I started my research with martingale, but now I hate it.
2. No. The idea is not to go for balance, but imbalance. If you see more reds, play reds. If you see more blacks, play blacks. Why? because black and reds will balance in "long-run" and we do not stay in casino for long enough, nobody does and nobody can ever stay that long in a casino......... human life is limited and therefore cannnot see a "long-run" in a game of 38 outcomes (37 in many countries)
3. As soon as I find a table, check last 9 from the display, pick the leader from last nine and follow this leader for next nine. If same leader, again follow this leader for next block of 18........ these 18 spins now become my blocks. Since 18 is an even number, I do not change my leader unless it is "defeated"
First nine = red is leader
Next nine = I play red, everytime
If red still leader out of total 18 = play red for next 18
If red no more leader = still play red (because it was leader in the first block of 18 but not in the next and therefore not defeated yet.)
If red no more leader = change to new leader (black) and play black for next 18 spins.
4. I consistently bet same amount on every spin, do not vary my bets.
The Thief of Wall Street