wont tries to.compound account again, makes me more greedy..not good for psychology
2
Why is GBPUSD called cable? 67 replies
Cable Update - Continued 102 replies
Cable (GBPUSD) vs Euro (EURUSD) 31 replies
Cable Update (GBP/USD) without Idiots 23 replies
cable short for gbpusd? 6 replies
Disliked{quote} //---- 1.7 per day for a year...... that's a steep hill to crawl up..... .....h //------ {file} {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} If trading was this easy, everyone would be a billionaire. And trading does not consists of win only, the other half is loss. Losses slow down the compounding process and required more effort to get back what you lost. Time also an important factor to consider in the equationIgnored
Disliked{quote} There is another detail. He is ignoring the software supercomputers that manage trading. As soon as he starts putting in his multi-million orders, those computers are going to start working harder to extract liquidity from his accounts to 'fund' their price movement activities, significantly increasing his level of difficulty! This is why any 'system' that works and becomes popular simply stops working. It's the popular piece that kills it!Ignored
Disliked{quote} 1:500 leverage. It is 200e margin on 1lot .. then, could easily have several lots. Taking 1 lot on gbpusd for 100 pip around 800e +/- Again: if you take 1 lot in 100k account -> 100 pips -> 800e profit (or loss) if you take 1 lot in 5k account -> 100 pips -> 800e profit (or loss). if you take 3 lots on 100k account -> 100 pips -> 2.4k profit (or loss) if you take 3 lots on 5k account -> 100 pips -> 2.4k profit (or loss) -> there is 600e for the margin Of course, those % have different numbers as they relate to a different account size. if...Ignored
Disliked{quote} one can do this with copy trading. Demo account 100 k shall be sender. 1000 $ real money account shall be receiver. The lot size multiplication is automatically doneIgnored
Disliked{quote} If trading was this easy, everyone would be a billionaire. And trading does not consists of win only, the other half is loss. Losses slow down the compounding process and required more effort to get back what you lost. Time also an important factor to consider in the equationIgnored
Disliked{quote} //---- 1.7 per day for a year...... that's a steep hill to crawl up..... .....h //------ {file} {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} aa4fx : I clarified how it is possible , one can make 29 k in a year with 400 $ repayable fee. I am waiting your reply in three lines how to ( you ) make 29k in a year with 400 $ real money account. Use my point no. 1,2,3 so that I can understand. And just write theoretically, that is enough. No need to show proofIgnored
Disliked{quote} I understand that time factor perfectly. That's why I said "average ROI" of +1.7% per day and +45% per month to get from $400 to $30k in a year, and that it would take longer to complete each of my levels past level 23 due to lower leverage rates. The average ROI is computed after all trades are completed, losses and winnings combined, as in my +61.9% return this month. If I would make that kind of return every month on average, then it won't take very long for me to climb those levels I laid out. Of course I am aware that losses do happen....Ignored
Disliked{quote} There is another detail. He is ignoring the software supercomputers that manage trading. As soon as he starts putting in his multi-million orders, those computers are going to start working harder to extract liquidity from his accounts to 'fund' their price movement activities, significantly increasing his level of difficulty! This is why any 'system' that works and becomes popular simply stops working. It's the popular piece that kills it!Ignored
Dislikedwont tries to.compound account again, makes me more greedy..not good for psychologyIgnored
Disliked{quote} There is another detail. He is ignoring the software supercomputers that manage trading. As soon as he starts putting in his multi-million orders, those computers are going to start working harder to extract liquidity from his accounts to 'fund' their price movement activities, significantly increasing his level of difficulty! This is why any 'system' that works and becomes popular simply stops working. It's the popular piece that kills it!Ignored