Disliked{quote} I guess I owe my apologies but you got it out of my system as my "tangent" is to tell the world HOW I TRADE and find unusual hurdles, everybody come as sceptics on the creator on why this and why that as if true then the scam is on their side and you sounded, maybe still, like one as you keep eyes off the ball. You have to resist, unless against your interests but that will be obvious in no time, to look what happens to Bill Gates, if he has tons of time investors and where is time there is money that costs more than money nowadays which...Ignored
A bit productive discussion we had. This is not an attack or me trying to get one-upmanship, I encourage you to ponder this aspect:
You mention:
"Just don't tell me you want the AHA that hit him hit you on the spot after skimming once twice and couple days screentime."
There are many systems/models of markets with from basic to esoteric ranging from moving averages, geometry shapes and even astronomy.
As a viewer, how is what you present (chaos) different from models say based on astronomy?
1. The authors have presented concepts that are supposed to be simple and could be understood,but the viewers don't.
2. The authors say everything that is needed to be successful is already given out and is the fault of viewers for not putting in the effort.
3. The author says the market is absolutely governed by astronomy and everything else is hogwash.
4. The author says it is the viewers loss if he is not able to understand.
5. The proof is in the eating the pudding, the author never shares any credible proof that it makes money.
While you are tempted to think, i am trying to undermine and insult you, it is not the case. I am encouraging you to realize from where we (the viewers) stand that the orbit tool (as of this moment) looks like any other system or model that 100's in numbers that are scattered through the forums.
I see that on the other site, more than 1500+ posts have gone by and you yourself are confounded why people are not able to understand orbit.
Let me flip the situation and if you were told that W.D.Gann's work is the key and offered no concrete evidence,would you be willing to devote thousands of hours?
Thanks
3