Right?
- Joined Mar 2021 | Status: Hate non sense talk, eat ur own BS | 625 Posts
Hope everyone gets green pips
Question about OrderFlow or OrderPosting via Broker or LiqProv 1 reply
Collection of posts/threads from orderflow traders 0 replies
Trendline, Trendline and Trendline 4 replies
Using future orderflow, to predict spot prices 16 replies
Vidas - Orderflow 1 reply
Disliked{quote} I'd have expected that you would have read the thread to understand what we are talking about. This thread is in its infancy so there is not much volume so it should be an easy read. Anyway, this is important: We are not trading trendline-break-and-retest. We are looking for areas on chart where price is compressed in a sort of a sloping range, which the trendline makes it easy for identification and framing. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I like your thread, I like your idea etc: I hope - people tend to be oversensitive regarding their own work - you don't take this the wrong way: I read the complete thread - and it wasn't clear to me that it is definitely not a TL-break-and-retest-strategy. What is totally clear to you (when writing and rereading it), may not at all be clear to other people (whose brains are "wired" fundamentally different from yours). I understand that this is "a work in progress" but nevertheless: I think you should take the time and redo your first post...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I understand the following: Not a TL break and retest idea: Yes, EngineerFX says it is not, therefore it is not. Weak area: The area where prices come and go from is inside a wider and therefore stronger area that usually I have seen will deliver stronger candles in average. Compressed zones: horizontal ranges with or without well-defined swings. Sloping range: A price interval that, shows a somehow sharp ascending or descending channel over a period of time. This is what I understand after checking the charts and reading the thread. {image}...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks a lot for your answer. I would prefer EngineerFX to answer (because it's his thread, therefore his answer seems more valid). "Not a TL break and retest idea: Yes, EngineerFX says it is not, therefore it is not." - I think everybody understands that but what does it mean? To know what something is not, doesn't help to make people understand what it is (to say something is not green doesn't tell me which colour it has). "Weak area: The area where prices come and go from is inside a wider and therefore stronger area that usually I have...Ignored
DislikedJust went through all the posts and I noticed the confusion some people are going through, this is a supply and demand strategy which uses a trendline break / compression as a confirmation, as a supply and demand trader this is an interesting thread and good work creating it. Let's keep the posts going.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I like your thread, I like your idea etc: I hope - people tend to be oversensitive regarding their own work - you don't take this the wrong way: I read the complete thread - and it wasn't clear to me that it is definitely not a TL-break-and-retest-strategy. What is totally clear to you (when writing and rereading it), may not at all be clear to other people (whose brains are "wired" fundamentally different from yours). I understand that this is "a work in progress" but nevertheless: I think you should take the time and redo your first post...Ignored
DislikedJust a short I took on EU today. RRR ~1:2.5 It is also valid under this thread. The system is repricing EU from 2 into 1. So we are moving relatively down. At a certain moment prices come up into 2 from 1 and there is a fractal sloping range under 3 (because 3 is compressed). But the main momentum is descending or negative. So the idea is selling there with SL above the prior swing and TP @1:3 that it is executed later at ~1:2.5 because I see slow movement. But the TP is not actually there to achieve a certain RRR, but because the distance is proportional...Ignored
Disliked{quote} You cannot accuse someone of being oversensitive and expect them not to take it 'wrongly'.Ignored