1
I want to add multiple orders and MM functions to this code 0 replies
Can somebody help to add these functions to this EA 0 replies
Can any body add this functions to my EA 6 replies
custom functions 2 replies
VT Trader Manual. Features and Functions 2 replies
Disliked{quote} It might not trade for 4 out of 5 days . this is due to volatility. but when it does, it make good $$$.. you can check on my link to see how its performing on Demo..Ignored
Disliked{quote} ive finally tried and result werent that really promising... i moved on after that... any recommendation ?Ignored
DislikedI have been getting PMs about the fact that this EA doesn't work on Live account. Yes it doesn't- as far as I've tested. There is a reason it wont work/work well on Live- it was cleverly coded into the EA. Please take note!.Ignored
DislikedI have been getting PMs about the fact that this EA doesn't work on Live account. Yes it doesn't- as far as I've tested. There is a reason it wont work/work well on Live- it was cleverly coded into the EA. Please take note!.Ignored
Disliked...there is a reason it wont work/work well on Live- it was cleverly coded into the EA...Ignored
Disliked{quote} It's not "cleverly coded" but a structural flaw of the system. The EA is originally based on the famous "MillionDollarPips EA". Credits for the initial transformation from MDP to XMT-Scalper go to a Swedish guy named Capella. Today various versions of his EA circulate in the internet by various names (MDP-Plus, XMT, Assar). None of them is suitable for trading real money. Main cause is a too small average realized profit in pip. A profitable test typically produces results similar to the following: TEST: {..., barModel=EveryTick, spread=1.0...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I had a test on demo with MDP and XMT 2.461. Clearly XMT was the winner. I saw very good performance on gold and GU which you can see in my TE in my profile. Also live test was not good. So Im going to copy from demo to live as suggest by Starlimit. After few tests with different brokers I decided to go with Tickml. As we know this EA approach is too sensitive to the broker and the VPS. I found a good VPS whish has 0.6ms to demo server.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I had a test on demo with MDP and XMT 2.461. Clearly XMT was the winner. I saw very good performance on gold and GU which you can see in my TE in my profile. Also live test was not good. So Im going to copy from demo to live as suggest by Starlimit. After few tests with different brokers I decided to go with Tickml. As we know this EA approach is too sensitive to the broker and the VPS. I found a good VPS whish has 0.6ms to demo server.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Nice. Can you post the .set files you use? Thank you. edit: v2.461 -> github.com/rosasurfer/mt4-mql/tree/b3be98e/mql4/experts/mdpIgnored