Disliked'look at the people here who have posted profitable charts and I doubt that you will find two the same ...' That's the point, you can count the profitable charts on one hand out of 4.5k pages.Ignored
Statements like "TDI is King" or "PA is King" as often heard are complete useless and only confuse new traders here. Both statements might be right in some way but for the majority looking for a strategy they can follow with the precision of a clockwork it makes absolute no sense.
If a trade setup failed people like Tekkies or Emmanuel will find 100+ excuses WHY it failed. Either because "TDI Angle" was wrong or Price Action looked wrong or you missed spotting a Support or Resistance level... For this reason also the charts posted by such traders here are not helpful at all. Most of these charts will only show ongoing trades to you where half of the chart is cut out, multiple entries for different kind of rules or no SL/TP marked at all. Basically no clear strategy is visible!
Therefor a big waste of time for new traders want to learn a strategy to believe looking at such things will make any impact for their own trading.
Donīt get me wrong, i donīt want to blame it on individuals here. Every trader is responsible for his/her trading. Even if traders like Tekkies and Emmanuel really want to help, this strategy is likely designed to fail for teaching to others. Personally I do not understand why they even consider keep posting such charts here. Honestly, it doesnīt help anyone.
Because it leaves so much room for contradictions. For every possible "high probability trade setup" introduced here i can show you at least one that 100% looked the same and NOT WORKED. With all the rules respected TMS gives for finding a valid entry setup. So the bets are 50/50 for such perfect trade setup to give you a winning trade. It can be a losing one same as good.
Otherwise if the strategy gives you at least a 50/50 edge (just for the entries) i really wonder why there is no profitable EA here. Because a 50% with proper money management and proper risk reward ratio should at least make trading this strategy profitable, even in the long run. And i donīt speak about making millions, i mean at least not making loss.
But guess what? It canīt do that. Nobody here is able to proof that, either by providing a track record for any manually traded account or fully automated. Therefor i think itīs also legit to name such persons as "fake traders". It does not have to mean bad. But if you are such successfully trading a strategy and even teach people here with what to do or not you should be able to proof that at any time for any reason.
1
2