I have start hedging it from 09:43 on 8 Sep 2017 (London time). And here are the closures I have manually made. USC account. Balance at start 526k. Now is 703k.
So, hedging seems to be also working...
Maadik Hugiis. IQ 69.
1
1
Hanover replies to PMs 1,425 replies
Trading (e)Books by MoneyZilla 120 replies
Abokwaik replies to PMs 95 replies
Disliked{quote} I think what confuses people with what Zilla does is the fact he doesnt try to nail a direction. For a trader who has a methodology that helps them predict a future move in a certain direction this will never make a single percent of common sense to them as they are able to pin point moves. Going through many of MoneyZillas posts you can see he doesnt attempt to get it "right".Ignored
Disliked{quote} true, but: in each hedging you have nothing more then one direction trade all the time, if you net it to one position, so exactly same like 1 position open with same amount.Ignored
Disliked{quote} EXACTLY! that is the outcome of hedging! one ends up with the RIGHT direction NET trades. Averaged... How to get that successful net trading style? I have no idea. The net trading strategies I have created cant bring that much money into the account. I am not saying net trading does not work. I just say hedging (for me) works better. And I am a lame trader. A hobby trader. My hands are good for holding boobs and money only. I use them for jerking off, as well. And I suppose, most guys on the market are probably like me... That is why I protect...Ignored
Disliked{quote}I have start hedging it from 09:43 on 8 Sep 2017 (London time). ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} really, noone will speak with you often if you dont start learn the math. if you trade in win with hedging, you would have much more win with not hedging, point. or in extrem cases same win. so simple is this case and math. you will not understand it, but really its my last post about this topic in this for you, i cant help you more, you dont want see and dont want learn basic math.Ignored
Disliked{quote} If that's your logic what hedging is, you really don't know what we are talking about... anyways pearls to swine.. lolIgnored
Disliked{quote} ??? ask me a question, your text is extrem stupid so, because you did not see it in context. my text is perfect correct by math, if you cant understand it, tell me your problem with it and i can help you, but please: know math first , then rethink, then write. or you will be angry about yourself later when you see "pearls to swine" is yourself.Ignored
Dislikedif you hedge for the purpose you explained, I don't doubt math. {quote}Ignored
Disliked{quote} if you trade in win with hedging, you would have much more win with not hedging, point.Ignored
DislikedYou said :{quote}. So im assuming you think if the direction is going up, you keep adding orders as long as the net is positive, then close the hedge once some orders are negative, but resulting in an overall positive value. In this instance, no one here is doubting the math dukas. Hope that helps your fx journeyIgnored
Disliked{quote} NO. when you trade same strategy with hedging and with no hedging: then you have always more win with no hedging or same win (when you merge (close by) all hedged trades before rollover time). what do you mean with adding order? i dont hedge or martingale! i am no beginner :-). looks you need to learn so much on your road to at least medium level. but you need to read more carefully. because you did explain my sentences complete wrong.Ignored
Disliked{quote} ok, but please inform you next time earlier, and dont speak in a topic about hedging when you dont know whats an hedge trade. a hedge trade is opening opposite new order to reduce net position, in opposite to the smarter way simple closing parts of the existing order to get same results, like all advanced traders do. i see, you are extrem new in trading, but difficult to show you this, many beginner traders have problems with understand hedging, for whatever reason. its so easy normally.Ignored