DislikedDisaster Today with twoma1rsi!! Keep buying Eurcad and no pullback..Ignored
- Joined Jun 2011 | Status: Swing trader using Market Cycles | 2,151 Posts
Money moves the market, not an indicator.
Top 100 best Trading Systems: post good Trading Systems here 49 replies
Are the best systems also the systems that fail most spectacularly? 55 replies
Systems, Systems and Systems... 1 reply
closing selected orders at once 3 replies
MLQ4 check if object selected 2 replies
Disliked{quote} Here, similar to what I did for EB. version "4.3" Minimum Distance between Cycle Orders (Input): 0 : Disabled, hence using default settings -ve : Will take buy orders only at lower price by at least Min. Distance (Pips/Points) Will take sell orders only at higher price by at least Min. Distance (Pips/Points) +ve: Will take buy orders only at higher price by at least Min. Distance (Pips/Points) Will take sell orders only at lower price by at least Min. Distance (Pips/Points) {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Maybe I found one problem with new filter (distance in pips). It seems EA calculate distance only between new trade and the first trade. For example if EA wants to open new trade and there are two actual trades in place so it calculates minimal distance between new trade and the first trade. Not between new trade and second what should be more logical. Can you check pls if this my teory is right? ThanksIgnored
Disliked{quote} No bugs. EA measures the distance with open orders, not previous closed ones. This is a sell example, with -100 order distance. {image} This is another example, where last order was closed by trailing stop, while the 1st and 2nd orders still running. In this case opening a new order will measure the distance to the highest order price, which will be the 2nd order. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I doesn't mean it measures distance with closed ones. I mean open. But it looks EA measures third order with first open one, fourth also with first one etc. So the distance is still measured only with first open orders not last (previous) open order.. Is it clear what I mean?Ignored
Disliked{image} I will ignore any system request sent via Private Messaging. .Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you would open multiple clams , would you share with the public the pearl wich you would found inside ? Such conditions to make the strategy public are a proof of disrespect regarding those who were working hard developing their strategies. Such conditions are specific to those who can't make money because they are so demoralized and convinced there is no way to earn money by trading forex. PS : here a profitable strategy , it's public: buy when price rise, sell when price fall . LoLIgnored
DislikedIf you would open multiple clams , would you share with the public the pearl wich you would found inside ?Ignored
DislikedPS : here a profitable strategy , it's public: buy when price rise, sell when price fall . LoLIgnored
Dislikedhi folks found this here https://www.mql5.com/en/code/13821 lets optimize this together ............. {image} {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Good work Spencer. As for the spread, I think 3 points (0.3 pips) is not realistic. Brokers that might offer such a spread will charge commissions. So I advise a minimum of 20 points (2 pips) for back testing. I usually do my test with 30 points (3 pips) on EUR/USD, to cover for spread widening and slippage.Ignored
Disliked{quote} hey Khalil, How things going? Is there any chance you could add the Stoc filter with your distance between trades filter. Want to test that out, I think it would help. I will then back test with better spreads set and see which pairs are actually worth while. I have a feeling I need to dump some pairs. We are still battling on exits, we missing so much profit with early exits. The system does not let the good orders run. something that we need to find a better way to handle. I am follow Braintheboss and waiting for his Soft SL to be release...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Avokwaik, today was the same problem with unclosing all postitions on EURJPY. Here is a picture of situation, I use RSI exit at level 90. EA opened 5 positions but closed only firs 3. Last two I closed manually later.. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} It could be because of slippage (although the EA tries multiple times to close each order, 3 tries as I remember). Better to provide a max slippage input and increase the number of tries or provide as input also. The bad news is that I overwrote -by mistake- the last version of the EA I have. Let me see what I can do. My habit was to upload the source on FF, which served as a good storage for all EA revisions. I stopped on advice from friends not to do that as it might be used commercially ..... etc. However, I feel obliged to give the source...Ignored