Disliked{quote} THE PRICE IS HEADING TO THE NEXT R AT 1.1350 PAWELFX YOU MADE THE SAME MISTAKE THIRD TIME AND NOW ON THE DAILY CHART,YOU ARE A BIG FAN OF COUNTER TREND TRADESIgnored
You talk the talk I walk the talk 8 replies
Much of Forex talk is illusional esoteric talk 141 replies
What is the difference between an "interday" chart and "intraday" chart? 2 replies
Disliked{quote} Dont give up. I used to make the same mistake, and I am not sure that I ' ve learned how not to make it. Continue to ask qwestions. We are learning from your questions and Atheer's answers.Ignored
Disliked{quote} (...)the last bear in 1st was taken out..........so who is the next? the bear at the high of the 2nd which is about 1.1350......if you look carefully the 2nd one was hit at the high of this yearIgnored
Disliked{quote} Hi atheer1. Above excerpt is unclear to me. Could you to show it in chart please ? Edit: 22nd Oct candle does not look like type1 in my chart... Did you mean 23rd Oct?Ignored
Disliked{quote} great! Thanks for the chart Just to clarify.. So if wick of the candle will not cross boreder (line) of the zone and will not extend into it but just touch the border of the next zone(candle no.6 in chart #95), we can still qualified that candle as a candle type1?Ignored
Disliked{quote} candle 6 chart #95 for my broker does extend by 0.5 pip in the zone======= type 1..............(what is about your broker?) if the high or low is exactly at the line========type 3 for this use your discretionIgnored
Disliked{quote} i noticed a similarity between charts 96 and 97 (not 98). In both of them there is not only the "turn setup" but also the formation of a new bear zone by two successive bear candles. I think that the new zone formation confirms even more the signal you get from the turn setup formation. Atheer, when you are showing "turn setups" you dont show the 2 candle zones. And when you are showing the 2 candle zones you dont show the "turn setups". But sometimes the two signals coincide.Ignored