The premise of what follows is that I enormously suffered the rigidity typical of some TAF interpretation.
And the general lack of preparation in discussing the matter. OK?
Hard words, I know.
Sir, don't ask me. I have nothing to teach.
Draw your own conclusions from what you see and what you have read.
> The Principle, The Concept, The Idea offered by fti.
> A rigid interpretation of the formula opposed to its flexible application.
> What 111 112 113 actually mean (and what - differently- fti is doing in that sample, stressing a single leg)
> When a quick attack with "scaling out exit" is required and when not.
> The infinite variations of execution and possibilities
> The fact that no trade is like the others and I posted hundreds of trades.
> My personal comfort
> You don't know the value of my entries and what I was searching and doing... you can't understand how many points I bagged.
> You apply your expectations... so just (false) beliefs.
etcetera...
It is only a list of little things you forgot... cause you are not asking but judging!
As I have already told you, I'm not interested in the debate anymore (especially with TAF people).
The point is, Sir, that you – guys and girls - forget the main fti's lesson... the correct spirit of all this story.
fti #89 - "I give you the sketch and you fill in the colours, make it your own painting. .."
What the men did with the same 7 notes?
Someone prefers to reduce them to 5 notes. Do you know the blues and the pentatonic scale?
Someone else preferred to expand them to 12. But they didn't have too much success.
Etcetera...
Don't carbon copy me... said someone! Guess who.
And imagine that he wanted to remove that chart precisely so as not to create rigidity through the example!
About the rest... trend, trend change, technique of reallignment, candlesticks, reversal candlesticks and other stuff....
my answer is always the same.
Study!
There are no secrets. Everything was already written somewhere.
1