Disliked{quote} actual retracement on ending diagonal is 127.2% of wave 3 if we count this with EW-rules ending diagnal has a retracement of ~ 78.6%Ignored
ˇ Welle 1 sollte die längste, Welle 5 die kürzeste Welle sein.
Disliked{quote} actual retracement on ending diagonal is 127.2% of wave 3 if we count this with EW-rules ending diagnal has a retracement of ~ 78.6%Ignored
Disliked{quote} wave 3 target was a 127.2% of wave 1 normal target of wave 3 is 78.6% {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Richtlinien (Ending Diagonal) ˇ Welle 1 sollte die längste, Welle 5 die kürzeste Welle sein.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Richtlinien (Ending Diagonal) ˇ Welle 1 sollte die längste, Welle 5 die kürzeste Welle sein.Ignored
Disliked{quote} in the EWP book there are even pictures of ending diagonals, where wave 3 is the longest. Keep in mind: a diagonal follows the rules of an impulse, with the exception, that in leading diagonals the waves 1, 3 and 5 are either impulses or ABC's, and in ending diagonals they are ABC's. And in all diagonals you see wave 1 and 4 overlap. Further rules are not specified to my knowledgeIgnored
Disliked{quote} I too would like to see a hit of 2353, because in this case the proposed wave 5 would be 138,2% of wave 4 (perfect hit). But since I do not bet so heavily on the exact numbers I am prepared and fine when it will go up straight. One thing so far bothers me: the FF rade explorers are clearly long positioned LOLIgnored
Disliked{quote} 2353 is a good level i have it on all my systems what i'm trading. 2350 is a large MOFU zone and a good S/R Area we have a nice fibo clusterzone here too. und das orderboard schaut auch nicht schlecht aus (nebenbei mal so) Wir werden unser Entry auf jeden Fall auf BE ziehn können.Ignored