I'm sorry for today that I have not posted.
I hadn't so much time , but I was also trying another platform, Sierra Chart, that now provides some new tools quite similar and useful like on NT to make volume analisys, and the most interesting thing is that is low cost and provides historical quote, this is what prompted me to do this test. The cons is that I compared it with NT quotes and there are some discrepancy in Bid/Ask quotes, so tomorrow I will compare again and try to understand which is more reliable. I think that for bid/ask quote is more reliable NT, but Volume at Price is more accurate on SC cos I think based on real volume like GomVolumeProfile, and not on approssimation like PriceVolumeHistogram or calculateValureHisto etc.
Below some screenshoots.
Lubo.
Edit: about visual impact NT is better.
I hadn't so much time , but I was also trying another platform, Sierra Chart, that now provides some new tools quite similar and useful like on NT to make volume analisys, and the most interesting thing is that is low cost and provides historical quote, this is what prompted me to do this test. The cons is that I compared it with NT quotes and there are some discrepancy in Bid/Ask quotes, so tomorrow I will compare again and try to understand which is more reliable. I think that for bid/ask quote is more reliable NT, but Volume at Price is more accurate on SC cos I think based on real volume like GomVolumeProfile, and not on approssimation like PriceVolumeHistogram or calculateValureHisto etc.
Below some screenshoots.
Lubo.
Edit: about visual impact NT is better.
If I know how, I tell You!! Few but Good!!