Dump time! Yayyy.
--------------------------------------------------
Chart study, discretionary no-indicator - wise, is view-only measuring; thus, velocity, tension, distance and other precise variables, which are used in most of life, are less useful.
The anchor idea is relative, and thus suitable for view-only measuring. I have a new way, one that makes ff shapes -- the original expansion ( ) -- able to give different features of an anchor set to decide where to put TL's etc. on it.
cohesion
response, stability, repetition
direction
While the dot list of anchors is fairly balanced between verbal description/name and the symbol, the symbol is more valued than the verbal description with these ff shapes / anchor views; thus, one may also interpret cohesion as gathering, response as impulse, repetition as layers, etc.
Thus, the new post#1 (so what...):
Right now, I think I can apply these to ordinary psych in the areas I've written about, at least until I can switch to local definitions to get further into an area. Global relative connectedness in this way is what I want, to open charts' applicability.
Okay, wait, I got'em aligned:
Simulator test flubbed badly. Attached this:
"Note: This object-oriented method has no area ranking, so user must use MTF or similar."
More simulator test, trades still poor. Added one more:
"When or how much a certain object's projection turns valid, is the subject of much loss. "
Risk looks okay now.
-----------
New territory for me:
A causative change in volatility.
Been wantin' this one since 2004 and vix...
And don't blame it on the symtri across the way. Its level is too off the GF's vertical.
This is important. So, I renamed the approach "volatility anchors".
Wait! Uncovered another.
The price action is readable through how 'weak' or 'strong' an anchor is on either side of the opposition (2) center, enabling my reading that is contrary to the exact evidence of how the price action tells the opposite of my interpretation.
Last: the jump-dot cycle that goes with emotion cycle, I think I can expand to any inter-anchor ratio and still retain the cycle's impact. A caveat is that relabeling one anchor a cycle position is concept-dependent.
Attached Image
--------------------------------------------------
Chart study, discretionary no-indicator - wise, is view-only measuring; thus, velocity, tension, distance and other precise variables, which are used in most of life, are less useful.
The anchor idea is relative, and thus suitable for view-only measuring. I have a new way, one that makes ff shapes -- the original expansion ( ) -- able to give different features of an anchor set to decide where to put TL's etc. on it.
cohesion
response, stability, repetition
direction
While the dot list of anchors is fairly balanced between verbal description/name and the symbol, the symbol is more valued than the verbal description with these ff shapes / anchor views; thus, one may also interpret cohesion as gathering, response as impulse, repetition as layers, etc.
Thus, the new post#1 (so what...):
Attached Image
Right now, I think I can apply these to ordinary psych in the areas I've written about, at least until I can switch to local definitions to get further into an area. Global relative connectedness in this way is what I want, to open charts' applicability.
Okay, wait, I got'em aligned:
Simulator test flubbed badly. Attached this:
"Note: This object-oriented method has no area ranking, so user must use MTF or similar."
More simulator test, trades still poor. Added one more:
"When or how much a certain object's projection turns valid, is the subject of much loss. "
Risk looks okay now.
-----------
New territory for me:
A causative change in volatility.
Been wantin' this one since 2004 and vix...
And don't blame it on the symtri across the way. Its level is too off the GF's vertical.
This is important. So, I renamed the approach "volatility anchors".
Wait! Uncovered another.
The price action is readable through how 'weak' or 'strong' an anchor is on either side of the opposition (2) center, enabling my reading that is contrary to the exact evidence of how the price action tells the opposite of my interpretation.
Last: the jump-dot cycle that goes with emotion cycle, I think I can expand to any inter-anchor ratio and still retain the cycle's impact. A caveat is that relabeling one anchor a cycle position is concept-dependent.