Home
Search Forums
Keywords:
Search Titles Only
User Name:
Exact Match
Show Results As:
Advanced Options
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Jan 7, 2008 4:08pm
forexmoments's Avatar
AshFX
 
Member Since Dec 2007
Default "The Pip Nailer". Any time frame, any pair

Dear all,

EDIT: Pip Nailer was a simple system that was created for fellow traders, primarly aimed towards those wanted a basic system, with a lightweight structure, and without any complicated rules. Results do vary from month to month, however I can't vouch for the system's effectiveness from around May 2008 onwards, since I haven't been trading it myself.

Two files attached - the actual PDF manual, and the template for MT4 users.

Regards,

Ash

EDIT: Please note, I do not recommend smaller timeframes, especially anything under 30min. Also, another rule of thumb is, only take the trade if the TP is at least twice the size of the pair's spread.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Pip_Nailer.pdf (38.1 KB, 25934 views)
File Type: tpl pip_nailer.tpl (1.1 KB, 11776 views)

Last edited by forexmoments, Oct 4, 2008 10:46am
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Jan 7, 2008 7:18pm
Member
 
Member Since Jul 2007
Default

Thanks for sharing, this system looks good I will test
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Jan 7, 2008 8:45pm
Member
 
Member Since Nov 2007
Default

What PSAR settings are you using?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Jan 7, 2008 8:56pm
pip_bagger's Avatar
Member
 
Member Since Apr 2007
Default Entries on screenshot

Thanks for posting your system. If I understand correctly (and even the simplest system can get tricky, especially when 'intuition' sneaks in), then you would have had six signals (see attached).

Of these six, I think that the second long would have probably been a loss. The third long may have been a loss or a break-even trade, maybe even a win if you exited at less than 30 pips (30 pips on this one may have been tough to squeeze out, but it was close).

The last short - we don't really know what would have happened as the chart ends mid trade

It is interesting to me that the longs were the 'problem trades' - suggests that a simple trend filter (moving average slope perhaps?) may keep you out of those. In this case your filter would have you taking shorts only.

Your example trade seems to suggest that it is only the color, not the direction of the AC or AO that matters. That is, you will take a short if the AO is red and below the zero line and the AC is red and above the zero line (and the parabolic SAR is above the candle, of course). Is this correct?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Jan 7, 2008 8:57pm
pip_bagger's Avatar
Member
 
Member Since Apr 2007
Default Screenshot

here it is.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	pip_nailer entries.JPG
Views:	8375
Size:	211.2 KB
ID:	77069    
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Jan 7, 2008 9:04pm
6pack's Avatar
I am a money magnet!
 
Member Since Jan 2008
Default Thanks for sharing! Questions:

Ash,

Your contribution is appreciated!

Could you please tell us how you developed this, i.e. why these indicators, etc.?
Also, have you done any backtesting?
Could you be more specific regarding tf and pairs - which work best from your experience?


Thanks again,
__________________
To err [and be stopped out] is human, but to persevere in error [or in a losing trade] is only the act of a fool. - Cicero [my additions]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Jan 7, 2008 9:16pm
Member
 
Member Since Dec 2007
Default The rules

Nice system, congrats for sharing!

Let me ask you... Your rules are:

- Red in awesome, red in accelerator, short in SAR => SELL

- Green in awesome, green in accelerator, long in SAR => BUY

How about an EA? I can program it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Jan 7, 2008 10:32pm
Member
 
Member Since Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pip_bagger View Post
Thanks for posting your system. If I understand correctly (and even the simplest system can get tricky, especially when 'intuition' sneaks in), then you would have had six signals (see attached).

Of these six, I think that the second long would have probably been a loss. The third long may have been a loss or a break-even trade, maybe even a win if you exited at less than 30 pips (30 pips on this one may have been tough to squeeze out, but it was close).

The last short - we don't really know what would have happened as the chart ends mid trade
If I am not mistaken, according to the rules in the PDF all three indicators need to change (buy to sell or sell to buy) simultaneously on the same candle. So the six entries you designated with arrows did not conform to the rules.

Were you trying to point out that it could still be a successful strategy without the simultaneous change as long as you traded with the trend? It would certainly provide more trades though the winning percentage may be affected.

Ash, can you tell us your winning percentage of trades and pips per month of your system? I am not asking for hard stats but just your estimate. It seems like it could have a very high winning percentage but fewer trades because of the nailed candle rule.

Thanks for showing this to us.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Jan 7, 2008 10:35pm
ChesterB's Avatar
Daytrader
 
Member Since May 2007
Default

that would rule!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Jan 7, 2008 11:14pm
pip_bagger's Avatar
Member
 
Member Since Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a777 View Post

Were you trying to point out that it could still be a successful strategy without the simultaneous change as long as you traded with the trend? It would certainly provide more trades though the winning percentage may be affected.
I'm all for trading with the trend.

I just wanted to point out that the rules for Ash's beauty here could be clarified.

Thanks again, Ash, this is looking great!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Jan 7, 2008 11:23pm
WHTenn's Avatar
Member
 
Member Since Nov 2006
Default

Nice share....thanks a bunch
__________________
"My Girlfriend was feeling neglected and gave me an option.... her or the forex. Boy do I miss her"


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Jan 8, 2008 12:28am
forexmoments's Avatar
AshFX
 
Member Since Dec 2007
Default

Thanks everyone for the appreciation.

Little busy right now, but I will answer some of the points raised later in the day!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Jan 8, 2008 7:23am
ChesterB's Avatar
Daytrader
 
Member Since May 2007
Default

i think a good way might be the psar has to change
but the others dont have to be the right color on
the previous bar...

that would give a lot more entries
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Jan 8, 2008 8:51am
Member
 
Member Since Nov 2007
Default

thx a lot for sharing this system
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Jan 8, 2008 9:34am
Member
 
Member Since Dec 2007
Default

doesnt work well on these settings.
Reply With Quote
Reply

1 Trader Viewing This Thread (0 are members)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broker Challenge "NDD/STP" vs. True "ECN" and "Mkt Mkr" broker talk XTrade Broker Discussion 1 Jun 5, 2010 11:25pm
Making an EA: "Simple Method of Scalping any pair by Imran Sait" WSAStartup Platform Tech 80 Jun 4, 2010 4:17pm
Whats the most technically "aware" pair?? cgarrad Trading Discussion 2 May 11, 2009 1:51pm
"The Pip Nailer" (EA - MTaboneWeb) mtaboneweb Trading Systems 74 Aug 22, 2008 5:20pm
15 pip trigger system - I've "got it" too magpie23 Trading Systems 18 Jan 24, 2008 6:54pm