It is amazing how many views and replies Phillip Nel's thread has gotten here at FF in the relatively short time period it has been in existence (since Jan. 2007). I mean, over 1 MILLION views and 8500 replies (at the time of this posting). Wow! The next closest thread - in terms of views and replies - is the "james16 Chart Thread". And that thread has been around 1 1/2 years LONGER than Phillip Nel's thread and STILL doesn't have as many views (or replies) as Phillp's thread!
So, that obviously brings up the question: Is the "4 Hour Strategy (MACD)" system the best system here at FF? In fact, is it the best system out there, period? I don't know because i personally haven't used the system. I've been focusing the Cornflower system because it's very simple and it works. I've looked at Phillip Nel's system and thought it was a bit complicated - at least when compared to the Cornflower system. That's the reason I haven't personally tried out his system. However, with the attention it has gotten, I plan to look closer at the system and give it a try.
So how about it? For those who have looked into it, is Phillip's system the best system going today?
Topgun
So, that obviously brings up the question: Is the "4 Hour Strategy (MACD)" system the best system here at FF? In fact, is it the best system out there, period? I don't know because i personally haven't used the system. I've been focusing the Cornflower system because it's very simple and it works. I've looked at Phillip Nel's system and thought it was a bit complicated - at least when compared to the Cornflower system. That's the reason I haven't personally tried out his system. However, with the attention it has gotten, I plan to look closer at the system and give it a try.
So how about it? For those who have looked into it, is Phillip's system the best system going today?
Topgun
"Success is not a fantasy, it's a formula." - MTI