Disliked{quote} Exactly that's how i enter using the hook(FTR in RTM). but when the pic changes when i change the TF , engulfing scenario also changesIgnored
Price Will Tell - Supply/Demand Price Action Trading 1,856 replies
Readthemarket (Ifmyante) - Is it legit stuff or not? 18 replies
Price Action + Demand & Supply Zone + Money Management 0 replies
Price movement as a function of Supply and Demand 43 replies
Suppy, Demand and Price Action 28 replies
Disliked{quote} Exactly that's how i enter using the hook(FTR in RTM). but when the pic changes when i change the TF , engulfing scenario also changesIgnored
DislikedI have hide pair name ..TF and other details. Only PA is displayed. Still you can analyze price action and make predictions. That means TF is nothing to do with PA as IF said. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Its true PA is not TF dependent. that's what i am saying all my posts.But not the way you and others think.Ok now lets say trader A found a short signal at a location then trader B found a buy signal on the same location on a different TF. Who is correct?. If i found engulf on one TF X and the other TF Y it is not, what you should do?. because for you any TF is correct. if you chose X then you are contradicting Y. If you chose Y then you are contradicting X. Thats the reason im saying TF is illusion. This is different from saying any TF....Ignored
Disliked{quote} Trader A can be a short term term and Trader B can be a long term trader or vice versa. Because if both of them are short term or long term trader then they won't get opposite signals with the same method.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I dont know whether this is a healthy conversation or not. But healthy debate often leads to better conclusion. Lets say kumaramy found an engulf in m5 then he goes to fine tune his entry m1 , he realize important FTR still not engulfed fully. what he will do?. Will he base his decision on m5 or m1. This is the issue that me and if im not wrong kanzler also has got. Sorry IF if im cluttering your thread.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I dont know whether this is a healthy conversation or not. But healthy debate often leads to better conclusion. Lets say kumaramy found an engulf in m5 then he goes to fine tune his entry m1 , he realize important FTR still not engulfed fully. what he will do?. Will he base his decision on m5 or m1. This is the issue that me and if im not wrong kanzler also has got. Sorry IF if im cluttering your thread.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Exactly mate, You spot on. Now in HTF it looked like an engulf. But in LTF its notIgnored
Disliked{quote} Yes, that's the issue I had a question about earlier. When IF replied though, it turned into a question of which one is more important, which is what I put the charts up for. I saw the higher frame supply/decision but when I zoomed in apparently I had overlooked the most precise area of entry. Right now in my mind it's about which one is clearest, but that's probably not how IF does it.Ignored
DislikedDo not forget the most important part part of trading: Not all trades are destined to be winners.Ignored
DislikedThe M1 chart doesn't always show us the exact PA which occurred. That's why we so often need to treat an entire M1 candle as a possible FL. {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hmmm... I know I am quite late in jumping on to this one but, here are some charts I marked up. {image} {image} {image} The candles... they always tell the truth... even when they lie. That's my RTM signature, btwIgnored