- Search Forex Factory
- 20 Results
- Technical replied Jun 12, 2008
Hi Zmax, I suspect that he's getting more signals because he's using "35 to 36". I don't have direct experience with these consensus calculations in an EA, but I've looked at a number of multipair measurements and I have the sense that those extra ...
- Technical replied Jun 12, 2008
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Technical replied Jun 11, 2008
Then again, some others seem to have done ok with this approach. It's the nature of the beast, I guess...
- Technical replied Jun 8, 2008
This tool may provide a useful perspective: url A given triangle's trendiness (or lack thereof) can be visualized at an interesting scale. It looks like it could be useful in figuring out appropriate SL & TP levels for larger scale trades. Thanks ...
- Technical replied May 31, 2008
I am following it for sure, as well. BTW nanningbob, I especially appreciated your thoughts & observations on death trade-avoidance. And your ea + breakout research is also interesting, thanks for that
- Technical replied May 28, 2008
I don't know if this will help in your your situation but here it is just in case: url url Caveats: I haven't used it, I don't know any users, I haven't seen any user feedback on how well (or if) it works, I have no affiliation with the sellers, ...
- Technical replied May 23, 2008
A digital playground.... Very, very sweet! Thank you.
- Technical replied May 8, 2008
Yikes! You're welcome.
- Technical replied May 7, 2008
I'm fairly sure that version 2000i had autoexecution capability with 3rd party brokers BEFORE Tradestation Inc became a broker, and I wouldn't be surprised if the preceding version, "Tradestation 4" had some sort of a brokerage link. BTW, 2000i was ...
- Technical replied May 6, 2008
Tradestation *may* have had autoexecution then or earlier, I don't know. If you really need an accurate answer, this guy is an *old* hand, exploring the edges of the possible, waaaaay back when. He was mainly using tradestation, but was looking at ...
- Technical replied May 6, 2008
These guys go back a ways: url There are of course other players, but the tradestation crowd has been at it for quite awhile. There is a similar Metastock group of similar age. - - - - If I was researching the early institutional folks I'd start ...
- Technical replied May 6, 2008
Here's a start: url
- Technical replied May 5, 2008
I've been paying close attention since the first of your Progression Sequence postings. For what it's worth, I have a very high regard for the tone, the quality, and the value of your contributions to this Forum. Thank you!
- Technical replied Mar 7, 2008
Whew.. Just made it thru all 24 pages.. trendchaser, thank you! You've obviously put a lot of thought and hard work into this. I'm too sleepy ATM to post anything very constructive, but a few pages back you asked for some ideas. One thought that ...
- Technical replied Feb 12, 2008
Whoops- I wondered whether I oughta leave that word 'demo' out... Didn't mean to imply anything, I was trying for accuracy and a bit 'o humor. Speaking of FxTradePro, some of his advancements are, uhm, also intriguing... "steady 0.5%~1.5% growth ...
- Technical replied Feb 12, 2008
Regarding respect for BK, I understand and agree. Regarding the difference between what he initially said and your beliefs, I understand that too. I've spent a *lot* of time looking at the various martingale EAs of the 'one direction per lotsize ...
- Technical replied Feb 11, 2008
Thank you!
- Technical replied Feb 9, 2008
It's not quite so obvious to me. Its early days yet, but so far the max drawdown % is not bad, especially considering the number of trades. At this rate of account growth, in a few weeks Burgerking can take his initial million bucks off the table, ...
- Technical replied Feb 8, 2008
Am I correct in assuming that you are opening both a long AND a short at the entry position? If so, something roughly similar has already been coded by Primajaya and another fellow at TSD, based on an opening time only, rather than time and ...
- Posts by Member Search: 'Technical'