- Search Forex Factory
- Isingh replied Apr 12, 2015
This is not an integrated part of this thread and will never be discussed by me in FF. As the British say " the proof is in the Pudding", while the Chinese teach from ancients "The name that can be pronounced is Not the True Name". The meager leaked ...
- Isingh replied Apr 12, 2015
Thank You ! Clarity.
- Isingh replied Apr 12, 2015
Would MUCH appreciate if you give some intro to your Weight-Assigning to the multitude of multifaceted S/R levels. How are the More Important distinguished from vs. Less Important ? How in Goodness Sake is it clear to some ??
- Isingh replied Apr 11, 2015
I think that (despite your impression) my goals here are practical. From practical point of view I am satisfied with simply evading most of St, Hn. by sufficient size of SL, and accepting the minority of them - by small enough position size(s), and ...
- Isingh replied Apr 11, 2015
EarnNow, Could you please comment, enlighten and add your remarks on the aspects that I have raised in the last post. Also - it would be only reasonable and FAIR to see some contributions of educational knowledge from other experienced and ...
- Isingh replied Apr 11, 2015
With all due respect it cannot be that I am the first person who precisely and matter-of-factly describes "stop hunting", can I. Even here - in FF there are actually several retired Institutional traders (e.g. in the EURUSD thread and in some ...
- Isingh replied Apr 11, 2015
Corrected: TWO DIFFERENT FX brokers. Not only possible, but I personally have witnessed something Very close to this being acted upon successfully. That means the "opposite position effect". As you could have heard majority of FX brokers for ...
- Isingh replied Apr 11, 2015
Question and input The size of SL which Would be perfectly compatible w. my method is about 35 pips. SL Problem Background: my broker is an ECN, and one of the most well examined of them all and critically checked and vetted in many forums. Both in ...
- Isingh commented Apr 10, 2015
Ignore sensationalism. just Read about 90 Trillion Debt of Chinese Banks (ye, yes these ARE Trillions - like Million of Millions). ZH has extensive articles on that Chinese DEBT BOMB. And then compare to this last idiotic propaganda piece of shill ...
- Isingh replied Apr 10, 2015
to print out and hang in front of every trader.
- Isingh replied Apr 10, 2015
Close AUDUSD 0.7681 (-) Reasonable drawd. , possibly Re Enter Buy later Close EURUSD 1.0627 (-) Hurting DD ., wrong entry (-) Minutes before important GBP news- so OUT. BUY AUDUSD 0.7684 Close 0.7683 (have to leave trading for a few hours) Buy ...
- Isingh replied Apr 10, 2015
Buy AUD/USD 0.7688 Buy EUR/USD 1.0629 COUNTERTREND BUYS - Positions Small.
- Isingh replied Apr 10, 2015
Short AUD/USD 0.7687 Close 0.7676 Short GBP/JPY 177.06 Close 176.95 Short EUR/USD 1.0643 Close 1.0620
- Isingh replied Apr 9, 2015
FAr from "the radar" too ? Well - silence is admission... Now i HAVE to exit my Long on it (notice the small 'I' ... feel diminished ...) Think my wordiness was too much for him. Apologize.
- Isingh replied Apr 9, 2015
Still seems to me AUD/USD is Almost ripe for your system's BUY. Reasons? Because you mentioned Clear Rejection of direction Down (or Up) and Resilience of Support (or Resistance) [respectively ] to enter the opposite - i.e. Buy (or Sell). ...
- Isingh replied Apr 9, 2015
One of the successfully solved challenges in these MUST be moderate sizing of positions. Only after sequence of events these grow. Not robotically (pun intended) on each and every loss or win.
- Isingh replied Apr 9, 2015
May I weigh in with something that IMHO is crucial and payed too little attention in this discussion of EA-s based on Renko ? This is a kind of pushing my own considerations. Sizing is critical - it often decides P/L ratio. I am a weak trader - yet ...
- Isingh replied Apr 9, 2015
Well my mistake. NO Pyramiding - it combines BADLY with RENKO.
- Isingh replied Apr 9, 2015
THANK YOU ! What can I add - WOW .....
- Isingh replied Apr 9, 2015
But isn't it You that preaches for PREDICTABILITY ABOVE ALL. NOT Gambling - PROBABILISTIC PREDICTABILITY ! BTW - about the daily correlations anyth. ?