- Search Forex Factory
- 18 Results
- FXWrangler replied Jul 26, 2013
I had a question in a PM that I'll answer here because close to the same thing was asked here as well. Eurusdd, if you read this and find it to be blatantly incorrect or too revealing, please delete it. I will not be offended. Quote:"...It seems in ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 25, 2013
Illustration
- FXWrangler replied Jul 25, 2013
Logic: 1. DS zones create SR areas 2. HH and LL from the past create these zones 3. LL and HH from the past are SR lines themselves 4. The first bar of a DS zone becomes a defined SR zone 5. Therefore we are creating new SR zones based on arbitrary ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 22, 2013
Eurusdd, I've remained largely silent because I haven't had anything more relevant to post. I have a question regarding the spotting of dissimilarities. I have other tools available to me than MT4 that make comparing data from indicators easier to ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 19, 2013
Again, I have to understand 'why' this is so. I don't question whether or not it is true. These are the only things that show currently: There is an existing M5 zone still alive. The bottom is 1.34163 on my charts (different broker). IF that is the ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 18, 2013
There is no ZZ swing high on that area, thus it isn't a level to create a DS from. it won't create a zone.
- FXWrangler replied Jul 18, 2013
I am on the same track as you as far as analyzing the 'why' of this. You are spot on and I would like to add a few things that should bring the rest of it to light. WARNING: THIS IS COMPLICATED AND WILL PUT YOU TO SLEEP BUT IT PROVES OUT. Not only ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 18, 2013
This is a real time example to see if my observation is true in this case. I observed previously that IF price closed below the low of the most recent DS zone then price would head for and/or take out the closest zone. I don't know if it will or not ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 17, 2013
Yes, sorry. I hand drew the chart and was only referencing what I had drawn. I also did a poor job of wording what I was trying to say...had to jet to a meeting. Here is a clearer chart of the same area. Here is what I meant to say: After the period ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 17, 2013
I located the screenshot and re-posted it here
- FXWrangler replied Jul 17, 2013
I believe my posts got mixed up in the shuffle from just being approved as a posting member. What I had said that never made to print was this: If price closes above or below the dissimilarity box during dissimilarity then it will take out the next ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 17, 2013
Also, because price did not break the zone between dissimilarities and has now started a new zone it will most likely not break the last zone either.
- FXWrangler replied Jul 17, 2013
screenshot
- FXWrangler replied Jul 17, 2013
I see it. If this isn't correct then it's very close. When a dissimilarity zone completes it creates the box. IF price breaks the high or low of that box during the period between similarities it usually clears out the next zone in the direction of ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 15, 2013
My posts are being moderated since I am a newly registered member so there is a delay from when I actually post them. I believe that restriction will be lifted at some point. If the amplitude of the difference is not important then does that also ...
- FXWrangler replied Jul 15, 2013
Yes. This is the largest I can find in my usable history. The price move itself is not outsized but the stoch diff indicator is off the chart.
- FXWrangler replied Jul 15, 2013
I've been reading FF for years and have pretty much never posted. PA and moving averages can only get you so far. I wanted to know WHY the market moved. So far, this is the only thread I have found that even begins to touch on this. I found this ...
- Posts by Member Search: 'FXWrangler'