- Search Forex Factory
- 67 Results
- steveshelby replied Jan 6, 2010
image What pair did you use for the 60% chance of winning? In a later post you mention shorting, is shorting included in the 60%?
- steveshelby replied Jan 6, 2010
It ain't over till the Fat Lady sings.
- steveshelby replied Jan 6, 2010
What would be the reason an edge would not be "precisely measurable"?
- steveshelby replied Jan 5, 2010
image Looks like a winner.
- steveshelby replied Jan 5, 2010
#27 nails it, IMHO.
- steveshelby replied Jan 5, 2010
Discipline solves all trading problems, IMHO.
- steveshelby replied Jan 5, 2010
Is the logic a secret?
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
Luck plays a bigger factor in wins than most traders' egos will allow them to admit.
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
Thanks. Do you follow the basic outline?
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
That did not say to buy above / sell below. Buy at bar open if bar opens above the ema(20) and sell at bar's close. Could you code that EA?
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
You made an assumption. That quote is for forex trading. It doesn't imply I have not traded other instruments. The following may have been clearer but since this is Forex Factory I made an assumption: "After studying FOREX for most of 2009, I am ...
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
Please see my previous post. It is not semantics.
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
Bingo! Statistics are calculated using historical data. Statistics should not be confused with probability. The math is similar but the difference between the two is huge.
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
Can you show that? I mean, can you show this with EA printout or by other means?
- steveshelby replied Jan 3, 2010
Not at all hanover. You are one of the few individuals that I have debated that hasn't stooped to name calling. Profit is the only goal of trading and if I learn a thing or 2 from you or anyone else along the way, that will just make it a bit ...
- steveshelby replied Jan 2, 2010
If you look at the definition of probability then you will understand why I say they do not. Probability is never based on history.
- steveshelby replied Jan 2, 2010
Do you have a trading journal or thread where I could read the details of how you trade without indicators? I notice you're a Jacko Trader but Jacko uses support and resistance which are "history".
- steveshelby replied Jan 2, 2010
Trade setups do not have probabilities. You can not do that with trading.
- steveshelby replied Jan 2, 2010
There is a reason to keep this stuff going - money!
- steveshelby replied Jan 2, 2010
Your signature, 95% of traders lose, because they go onto Forums and get taught how to lose, is a very accurate description.